Search for: "Matter of Mark T." Results 8001 - 8020 of 16,585
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2015, 7:00 am by Sebastian Brady
Mark Martins, and Matt Danzer provided two-day summaries (Monday-Tuesday and Wednesday-Thursday) of the week’s happenings. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 11:58 am by Josh H. Escovedo
Otherwise, be sure to stay tuned to the IP Blog and we will keep you apprised of any developments regarding the mark I’M JUST HERE SO I WON’T GET FINED. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 2:34 am
If the COLOURBLIND case (Pangyrus Ltd v OHIM, RSVP Design Ltd, Case T-257/11) had been a movie, it would have secured a nomination for its intricate screenplay, in the spirit of the recent Academy Awards. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
  Without the Third Restatement, that doesn’t happen.Just because we said so, however, doesn’t make it so. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 10:35 am by Harry Cole
If true, that would mark the end of the protracted turf battle between the FAA and the FCC. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 10:13 am
If it doesn't, try to find out why. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 6:00 am by Martha Engel
Does it matter at all if wine drinkers are a certain class of consumer, where bourbon or tequila mixed drinks may be consumed by a totally different class of consumer? [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 3:18 am
Henry Bell did this by establishing that it had not used the sign SUPREME as a trade mark at all.* There was honest concurrent use by Henry Bell of the word "supreme" for over 20 years without causing confusion; this demonstrated that the use had no adverse effect on any function of the word mark -- and it didn't infringe the stylised and ribbon mark registrations. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 1:04 am by Steve Baird
., at the 25th Annual “PTO Day,” sponsored by the Intellectual Property Owners Association: John will be part of the panel update on TTAB practice, and I’ll be providing the overview of Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, that pesky provision of the federal trademark statute that bars registration of certain types of marks that violate public policy, including any trademark that “[c]onsists of or comprises immoral . . . or scandalous matter; or matter… [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 3:13 pm
Calling all trade mark students. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 1:57 pm by Steve Vladeck
In marked contrast to the briefing, Monday’s argument spent surprisingly little time on the question of whether the three-strikes provision is ambiguous. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 1:12 pm by Mark Eiglarsh
Anything short of that will not acquit the defendant no matter how long or serious his mental illness might be. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 2:12 pm by Jonathan Bailey
The matter eventually went to court and, though the publication was blocked and the book seized, the matter eventually went before the Swedish Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 2:30 am
 This Kat and Tim have promised each other a game of chess ever since 1994, and it still hasn't happened. [read post]