Search for: "PAGE v. UNITED STATES" Results 8001 - 8020 of 9,968
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2010, 1:18 pm by Andrew Koppelman
(108; all page references are to Cahn and Carbone’s book.) [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 6:02 am
Last week, the United States Supreme Court reversed and held, in a 5-4 decision, that CPLR 901 is not a state substantive law that trumps FRCP Rule 23. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:09 pm by Jason C. Brown
Massachusetts was the first state in the United States to allow same-sex marriage with the Goodridge v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 10:23 am by Eugene Volokh
If this content is not in your news reader, it makes the page you are viewing an infringement of the copyright. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 11:15 pm by Ilya Somin
Ironically, the states’ position might well be saved by the Supreme Court’s controversial decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 9:16 pm
– ‘perpetual’ licenses: BMS Computer Solutions Ltd v AB Agri Ltd (IPKat) EWHC: Exclusive jurisdiction clauses and anti-suit injunctions: Skype Technologies SA v Joltid Ltd & others (JIPLP) EWHC finds Newzbin liable for copyright infringement: Twentieth Century Fox v Newzbin Ltd (TorrentFreak) (1709 Copyright Blog) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (Managing Intellectual Property) Fifth OiNK uploader walks free (TorrentFreak) Warner Bros recruits students to spy… [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:22 pm by Sheppard Mullin
” In light of the implications of this decision and the parties involved, this case will be appealed to the Federal Circuit and quite possibly could find its way to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:34 am by Anna Christensen
United States (09-6338) SCOTUSwiki page for additional updates. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 6:31 am by Anna Christensen
Harris (08-586) SCOTUSwiki page for additional updates. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:36 pm by Orin Kerr
“The president, just like any other citizen of the United States, is bound by the law. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 4:08 pm by Matt Cameron
In a perfect world, the Supreme Court would have mailed courtesy copies of this decision to every criminal defense attorney in the United States firmly affixed to a very large bottle of J+B. [read post]