Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 8001 - 8020
of 13,105
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2012, 1:13 pm
For example, during debate about the Judges’ Bill of 1925, which transferred significant docket-setting discretion to the Court, a Senator from Montana commented that he found it difficult to “yield to the idea that the Supreme Court of the United States ought to have the right in every case to say whether their jurisdiction shall be appealed to or not. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 9:52 am
The case is yet another example where an appellate court considered the impact of the landmark United States Supreme Court decision in Concepcion v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
In Truly Nolen of America v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 4:28 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 10:57 pm
Defendant petitioned for review. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 7:05 am
The case is Chafin v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:40 am
UPI’s Michael Kirkland discusses the Court’s Fourth Amendment cases dealing with intrusive police surveillance and what they may portend for the increased police use of drones in the United States. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 5:43 am
United States Environmental Protection Agency, ARB No. 08-059, ALJ No. 2008-CAA-3 (ARB July 31, 2012), Decision and Order of Remand. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 2:40 am
Interpreting the United States Supreme Court decision Schmerber v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 3:09 pm
" United States Parole Comm'n v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 10:00 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 6:19 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 7:41 am
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, in United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 6:22 am
In Sanchez v Sanchez, 2012 WL 3204183 (W.D.Tex.) [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 5:30 am
Ark.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of AmericaAmicus brief of Center for Class Action FairnessReply of petitioner Missouri Title Loans, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 8:37 am
Lens.com, Inc. v. 1-800-Contacts, Inc., No. 2011-1258 (Fed. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 7:32 pm
The Justice Department acknowledges that it has already started restricting when Guantanamo prisoners can challenge their detention in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 10:14 am
See Sparks v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 9:00 pm
V. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 7:43 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Merck KGaA v. [read post]
