Search for: "Reproductive Rights"
Results 8001 - 8020
of 8,493
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
This follows a near 20-year-long campaign for the right to broadcast sentencing. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
The Eastern District Court of New York did not delve too deeply into the question of causation, but it did conclude that “Regardless of the precise role played by defendants’ employees, the above-described operation of the Make-A-Tapes clearly evidences their commercial exploitation by defendants for profit in derogation of plaintiffs’ rights of exclusive publication. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
In relatively rare situations, a child’s birth may have resulted from surrogate parenting arrangements or the use of new reproductive technologies. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:49 am
Rights “equivalent to any of the exclusive rights within the general scope of copyright” are rights established by law — rights that restrict the options of persons who are strangers to the author. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 4:03 am
Not really strict right now properly understood: fair use, even though the burden is on the defendant. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 1:58 pm
Corel, there is some question as to whether copyright can exist in one of the categories specified in the 1909 Act: reproductions of works of art. [read post]
2 May 2012, 6:29 am
Since it can never be proven wrong, my theory is right! [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 6:18 am
Fox sued for copyright infringement, alleging, in part, that Dish directly infringed its reproduction right when it made PTAT copies of Fox television programs. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:46 pm
Others include hypoplastic right heart syndrome, hypoplastic left heart syndrome and tetralology of the fallot. [read post]
7 May 2020, 9:05 pm
The petitioners, a group of Pennsylvania businesses, claimed that the order is causing “substantial, unprecedented damage to the economy” while violating their constitutional rights. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 9:01 pm
Clay DeGayner (left), and his brother Ralph DeGayner (right), have volunteered thousands of hours to benefit the Key Largo woodrat. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:32 pm
As Richard Wolf put it in his USA Today preview last week, the case is full of hot-button issues such as religious freedom, corporate rights, federal regulation, abortion and contraception. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 12:19 am
It’s the first ever copyright lawsuit involving the unauthorized reproduction of tattoos in creative content to reach trial. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
In addition to charging often unconscionable amounts for subscriptions, most commercial publishers have extremely restrictive licensing practices, in effect taking from authors their copyrights and assuming all rights and permissions for the distribution, reproduction and use of their work in perpetuity. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 2:32 pm
Right now the number of law school applicants has dropped some 13% over last year. [read post]
25 May 2012, 7:21 pm
The legislation applies to any health care provider that is eligible for federal funding under 42 U.S.C. 1396d(1)(2)(B)Reproductive Rights: JUDGE STOPS TEXAS FROM BARRING PLANNED PARENTHOOD FROM HEALTH PROGRAM, Planned Parenthood Ass'n of Hidalgo County v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 11:37 am
They sang a number of other songs, some quite humorous, many unsuitable for reproduction here in this family-oriented publication. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:01 am
The first is exporting the idea from academia that sex as we know it—as a complete body designed toward reproductive ends—isn't real but rather socially constructed in service of the patriarchy. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 5:30 am
http://t.co/8q49Rf2X5Q -> Ontario Judge Strongly Pushes for Greater Use of Technology in Courts and Orders E-Trial http://t.co/hoQ3nj0KgH -> Digital Rights Ireland (Judgment of the Court) [2014] EUECJ C-293/12 finding data retention Directive invalid http://t.co/EJDCw2jpSy -> Warning! [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 3:02 pm
Corel, there is some question as to whether copyright can exist in one of the categories specified in the 1909 Act: reproductions of works of art. [read post]
