Search for: "S. W., an individual" Results 8001 - 8020 of 11,738
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2012, 8:37 am by Bill Marler
Dis., 2001 Oct. 1;33(7): 1010-4; Barth, W. and Segal, K., “Reactive Arthritis (Reiter’s Syndrome),” American Family Physician, Aug. 1999, online at www.aafp.org/afp/990800ap/499.html [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 7:56 am by PaulKostro
Should a party disagree with the choice elected or if the guardian is not fulfilling his or her statutory responsibilities, that individual may seek the court’s intervention. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 7:30 pm
Now, the Administration has stepped in with its opinion saying: [W]e continue to oppose S. 1145 - in its entirety - unless Section 4 is significantly revised, as we believe the resulting harm to a reasonably well-functioning U.S. intellectual property system would outweigh all the bill’s useful reforms. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 7:31 am by Eugene Volokh
"[W]hat may amount to submission depends on what a person was doing before the show of authority[.] [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 10:56 am
Supreme Court, that “[w]e are not ? [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 8:26 am by PaulKostro
Where a self-employed party moves for a reduction in alimony, “`what constitutes a temporary change in income should be viewed more expansively’” as such an individual is “in a better position to present an unrealistic picture of his or her actual income than a W-2 earner. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm by Kelly
A form 2848 allows a qualified individual to represent you before the IRS. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 8:15 am by Eric S. Solotoff
Rather, the Court held that: In fashioning its discovery order, the trial court should take appropriate steps to safeguard the privacy of the spouse or civil union partner receiving alimony and the individual with whom that person is alleged to be cohabiting. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:27 am
" The Department imposed the penalty recommended by OATH: termination.In response to an appeal filed by the Bey employees pursuant to Section 76 of the Civil Service Law, the City's Civil Service affirmed the Correction Department's dismissal Bey correction officers.Bey's appeal to State Supreme Court set out several claims but only one survived: the claim that "[t]he charges, the hearing procedures and the discharge of the [Bey officers] violated… [read post]