Search for: "Short v. United States"
Results 8001 - 8020
of 10,141
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2011, 7:47 pm
” Baffa v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 12:42 pm
In United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 12:51 pm
” United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 11:39 am
Bame v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 5:40 am
On March 24, 2011 United State District Court Judge James P. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:23 pm
Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) to register the APP STORE mark in the United States, and the USPTO eventually approved Apple’s application to register the APP STORE as a trademark. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:20 pm
(Eugene Volokh) There’s been much talk about the trial court decision in Mansour v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 12:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 7:45 am
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 5:50 am
State v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 12:53 pm
In a short decision released on February 28, 2011, the United States Supreme Court declined to hear a workers’ compensation case on appeal from an intermediate Louisiana appeals court, in which the appeals court found that an employer could not deny workers’ compensation benefits to an individual simply because he was an undocumented worker at the time of his injury.The case, Vaughan Roofing & Sheet Metal, LLC v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:51 pm
The President's power, as stated in Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution: The President shall be commander in chief of the Army and Navy of the United States. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 2:28 pm
SHORT TITLE. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 1:27 pm
United States — which was heavily relied on by the Ninth Circuit decision invalidating the Stolen Valor Act — stated that speech is fully protected (though that protection might be overcome under strict scrutiny) unless it fits within historically established First Amendment exceptions. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm
Discon, Inc., 525 U.S. 128 (1998), the Supreme Court of the United States stated that: [P]recedent limits the per se rule in the boycott context to cases involving horizontal agreements among direct competitors. [. . .] [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm
House Passes Another Short-Term Budget CR USDA Study Indicates Success Of Agriculture Conservation Practices Great Waters Coalition Urges Senate To Reject Budget Cuts National Pork Producers, et al v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 12:20 pm
And Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:26 am
In short, Mrs Patmalniece was a Latvian pensioner who came in 2000 to the UK. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 11:11 am
Since the United States Supreme Court announced its decision in Bilski v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 11:11 am
Since the United States Supreme Court announced its decision in Bilski v. [read post]
