Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 8001 - 8020
of 13,225
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2009, 7:43 am
An important question (that will not be addressed by the Court of First Instance, but which is nevertheless relevant from a policy standpoint) is whether antitrust intervention was at all needed in a market characterized by increasing output, decreasing prices and sustained innovation. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 9:22 am
She is a law clerk at Price Benowitz LLP and in her final year of law school. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 6:26 am
United States, 140 Fed. [read post]
24 May 2010, 12:50 pm
See Verizon Services Corp. et al. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 1:24 pm
The Supreme Court held in BFP v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 5:31 am
5 Dec RT @gnawledge (3 Geeks) The End of Traditional Billing http://bit.ly/sCpmPz || law firms have lost pricing control 6 Dec Hildebrandt Blog: Rising expenses and uncertain economy cause firms to re-evaluate staffing http://bit.ly/uXo2wP || Agreed 9 Dec Legal Process Outsourcing The Lawyer (UK) analyzes costs of legal + biz support globally. http://bit.ly/tdUQoX || will more firms nearshore, farshore, or use LPO? [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 2:29 pm
Jolson's opinion yesterday in Ewalt v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 11:20 am
In New York Stock Exchange LLC v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 7:47 am
In Aya Healthcare Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:00 pm
” A class of plaintiffs filed Nichols v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 11:51 am
v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
He left the bulk of his estate to the United States.[2] He never explained what he expected the United States to do with the money, which was then the largest unrestricted gift ever made to the federal government.[3] “Taxes are the price we pay for civilized society,” he’d once written in a famous dissent.[4] Was the bequest a kind of tax he felt he owed the country? [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 11:20 am
In Kirkpatrick v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:00 am
Toronto (City), 2001 SCC 68 at para. 14; Hislop v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:07 am
In finding that the mark consisted of the shape that gave the product substantial value, the CJEU stated that this concept was not limited to the shape of products having only artistic or ornamental value and that it also covered products with “essential functional characteristics”. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 7:00 am
SEC v. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 3:33 am
The plaintiff contributed 20% of the purchase price and received a 20% membership interest in Pedani. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 3:33 am
The plaintiff contributed 20% of the purchase price and received a 20% membership interest in Pedani. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 11:55 am
ShareThe Supreme Court heard oral argument Tuesday in HollyFrontier Cheyenne Refining, LLC v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 10:59 am
In Houle v. [read post]
