Search for: "Test Plaintiff" Results 8001 - 8020 of 21,967
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2019, 1:35 pm by Robert J. Fleming
” The retailer says the tests “have mischaracterized fibers in the products as asbestos. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 1:00 pm by Mashel Law, L.L.C.
In 2018, Plaintiff Anthony Alleyne filed a class action lawsuit against his employer, the New Jersey Transit Corporation (NJ Transit), alleging that NJ Transit violated the LAD by discriminating against him based on his disability, sleep apnea. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 6:28 am by South Florida Lawyers
Neither does the ACLU’s knowledge or belief have any bearing on the Defendant’s affirmative defenses.Oh yeah, one other thing -- the ACLU is counsel of record in the suit challenging the Governor's insipid drug-testing policy:Finally, the most troubling aspect of these subpoenas is their impact on the ACLU’s role as counsel in the case on behalf of the Plaintiff. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:57 pm by Evan M. Levow
Part of the process, for example, involves field sobriety tests that are not part of the standard battery of tests approved by the NHTSA. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:57 pm by Evan M. Levow
Part of the process, for example, involves field sobriety tests that are not part of the standard battery of tests approved by the NHTSA. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 3:04 pm by Lebowitz & Mzhen
The plaintiff in the case was trying to submit expert testimony on the connection between lead poisoning and ADHD, and disputes arose over the admissibility of the evidence. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 11:04 am by Erin Napoleon
The complaint addresses the test that the California Supreme Court adopted in Dynamex. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 10:26 am by brettb
And if not, your attorney may refer you for this testing. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:51 pm by AnnMarie McDonald
  $1.5 million was put in escrow for medical testing last year. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 12:20 pm by Eric Goldman
Thus, of the three tests, the reasonable interest test is the most plaintiff-favorable, and the categorical test is perhaps the most defense-favorable. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:18 pm by DeFrancisco & Falgiatano
She underwent a blood test and an ultrasound to determine whether she had an intrauterine pregnancy, an ectopic pregnancy, or was suffering a miscarriage. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 2:50 pm by Michael O. Smith
The appellate court also pointed to evidence in the record suggesting that the accident was minor and happened at low speed, that the plaintiff did not experience certain pain symptoms until well after the accident, and that the plaintiff’s neurological tests did not support a finding of radiculopathy. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 8:48 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
More Blog Posts: Court Finds that Car Dealership’s Insurance Policy Did Not Cover Customers on a Test-Drive, Maryland Car Accident Attorney Blog, published August 7, 2018. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:48 am by Moseley Collins
Moreover, the Notice of Independent Medical Examination of plaintiff expressly states: Further, the scope of said examination shall include and require a history to be given by plaintiff, as well as possible X-rays and any and all clinical and laboratory tests as required by the examining physician. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 5:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Sometimes, as in this case, the legal malpractice claims pass a CPLR 3211 test and go on towards trial. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 8:14 am by DeFrancisco & Falgiatano
The court distinguished this case from others cited by the plaintiffs, where diagnostic testing or similar evidence in the medical records supported malpractice claims. [read post]
9 May 2019, 1:17 pm by skelly
  From 2010 on, the plaintiff sold insurance under a contract with the Seery Agency and filed taxes as a sole proprietorship called Fred Walfish Insurance. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 1:48 pm
  A market test for materiality has objective appeal until one gets down to the messy business of measuring it. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 6:21 am by Howard Wasserman
First, the Court still spoke in terms of a "plausible 'short and plain statement' statement of the plaintiff’s claim, not an exposition of his legal argument. [read post]