Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. " Results 8001 - 8020 of 8,743
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
Board of Education; Ely was less taken by the Court's ability to discern substantive values, but he did strongly believe that the duty to monitor the basic procedures of the republic and to engage in “representation reinforcement” to protect marginalized groups who could not in fact participate adequately in America’s system of interest-group politics (even if, as we have recently been reminded, he vociferously opposed Roe v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 6:21 pm by Dennis Crouch
Innovators and their investors have long been vital to a flourishing innovation economy in the United States. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 1:04 pm by WIMS
    On February 23, 2011, in response to Federal court orders in Sierra Club v. [read post]
As many in the United States struggle with unemployment, layoffs, furloughs, pay cuts, and other adverse effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, pregnant women struggle just to be treated just like everyone else. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 11:02 am by Jeff Gamso
The country that has taken the place of the United States of America is a completely lawless country. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 2:22 pm
  The EAJA provided that a party prevailing against the United States could get attorney's fees unless the position of the United States was "substantially justified. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 12:47 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Quotations from our interviews and survey responses reflect the views and personal experiences of individuals, not necessarily the experience of most ISOs across the United States. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 5:37 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Says her judgment would result in “amnesty for everybody” and “her judgment is so bad that she should never be President of the United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am by Eric Goldman
 Source. ____ Q: Who was issued the first patent issued in North America, and for what? [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Sackett v. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:18 am by Eric Goldman
’” The examining attorney at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) refused to register the proposed mark on the ground the phrase falsely suggests a connection with a person (here Donald Trump) in violation of Lanham Act Section 2(a), and also because this mark violates Section 2(c) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm by Ronald Collins
Since the mid-1970s, he has been deeply pessimistic about the possibilities of political change: Political action of any sort, he believes, cannot improve or ameliorate the condition of black people in the United States. [read post]