Search for: "US v. Givens"
Results 8001 - 8020
of 51,332
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2021, 10:35 am
The case is entitled Whiteside v. [read post]
11 May 2021, 9:26 am
(Wesch v. [read post]
11 May 2021, 8:54 am
The objection should be admitted into the proceedings.- Novelty- The reasons given for the main request applied to the claims of auxiliary request 1. [read post]
10 May 2021, 4:54 pm
The Board did not give factors to assess, on what basis Facebook should decide whether the user still poses a serious risk, if the user is suspended and unable to use Facebook. [read post]
10 May 2021, 3:06 pm
P.D.V-G., Appellant, v. [read post]
10 May 2021, 7:25 am
Prior to the Supreme Court’s decision in INS v. [read post]
10 May 2021, 3:56 am
Or perhaps not quite the same, given that, unlike most small, owner-operated start-up sales or service companies formed as LLCs, often without any written operating agreement, the sponsor typically is formed under Delaware law by sophisticated investors/managers using experienced transactional lawyers from major law firms to prepare intensely considered operating agreements. [read post]
10 May 2021, 3:20 am
Supreme Court case, Tinker v. [read post]
10 May 2021, 1:00 am
It is a recognised phenomena in patent proceedings that patents are often given a different interpretation in opposition and infringement proceedings, termed the "Angora cat" phenomena after Sir Robin Jacob's comment European Central Bank v DSS [2008] EWCA Civ 192:Angora KatProfessor Mario Franzosi likens a patentee to an Angora cat. [read post]
9 May 2021, 9:08 pm
Supreme Court’s 2000 decision in FDA v. [read post]
9 May 2021, 6:42 am
Leibel v Baird CHI/29UC/HMF/2020/0035 (4 May 2021) (FTT decision available here) This was an application for a rent repayment order in respect of an unlicensed property. [read post]
8 May 2021, 3:41 pm
In the case of Solis v. [read post]
8 May 2021, 3:09 pm
" United States v. [read post]
8 May 2021, 1:54 pm
I think he could well have prevailed had he sued, especially given Sixth Circuit precedent. [read post]
8 May 2021, 5:08 am
Specifically, the court considered that use of the mark in third-party ads displayed on Amazon’s marketplace relating to counterfeit goods and the subsequent shipment of such items by Amazon through its own FBA programme constituted direct infringement by the platform itself.The decision was partly reversed on appeal last year (Court of Appeal of Brussels (9th Chamber), Amazon Europe Core sàrl, Amazon EU sàrl and Amazon Services Europe sàrl v Mr. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
(citation omitted).2 Öcalan v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 4:36 pm
See, e.g., In re I-Coat Co., 126 USPQ2d 1730, 1737 (TTAB 2018) (citing Presto Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 3:11 pm
The case, Terry v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 1:11 pm
Smith v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 12:53 pm
Kuhn Chevrolet or Herron v. [read post]
