Search for: "United States v. AT&T, Inc." Results 8001 - 8020 of 8,842
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2007, 9:41 pm
-based DNS expertise and in order to preserve stability, it makes sense to headquarter the new corporation in the United States. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 1:01 am
Supreme Court in 2005 upended the federal sentencing guidelines in United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
The Counterargument of Judges Brown and Kavanaugh In a 2010 case, al-Bihani v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
: (Patenting Lives), Worldwide increase in patent filings puts strain on system: (Managing Intellectual Property), WIPO releases 2008 Worldwide Patent Report: (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (Patent Prospector), (IP Updates), Global patent filings continue rise but may level off; smaller nationals slipping: (Intellectual Property Watch), Means plus function: Don’t ignore the man behind the curtain: (Intellectual Property Directions), Technology start-up entrepreneurs and… [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 12:24 pm by Brian A. Lebrecht
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., et al. was announced out of the United States District Court, Southern District of New York. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 12:24 pm by Brian A. Lebrecht
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., et al. was announced out of the United States District Court, Southern District of New York. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 2:17 pm by Patricia Hughes
[See CTV News Story here and decision in Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am by Keith Szeliga and Daniel Alvarado
”[12] Importantly, there is no presumption of cost reasonableness.[13] If an initial review of the facts results in the Government challenging a specific cost, the contractor has the burden to prove that the cost is reasonable.[14] The FAR provides that whether a cost is reasonable depends on a “variety of considerations and circumstances,” including the following: Whether it is the type of cost generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the conduct of the… [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 6:37 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
Also, it found that this measure was “necessary in a democratic society” as it was manifestly illegal to publish the photos, and because courts in two European States had found them to be illegal. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 12:04 pm by Zak Gowen
”[16] Of course, it is hard to imagine that any drug sold in the United States does not enter the stream of California commerce. [read post]