Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 8001 - 8020 of 9,848
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Two Cheers for Recess Appointments Peter Shane (Ohio State University) | June 26 As losses go, NLRB v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 3:44 pm by David Kopel
On Aug. 14, a 2-1 panel of the Ninth Circuit ruled California's confiscation unconstitutional, in Duncan v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 8:25 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
” FBI Special Agent in Charge Arena stated, “Health care fraud and the abuse/diversion of prescription medications are increasing criminal threats to the United States. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:09 pm by Leslie Sammis
The notice must also state that a forfeiture action "may be filed against the property. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Berke Gursoy
This is a high but not impossible bar to meet, as shown in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
” The article reports views from a conference in the United States where the attendees noted there was a whole new industry of reputation-restoration firms like the UK-based Kwikch [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 9:12 pm
The Board separately remanded to the judge the claims of six other individuals for a determination of whether they were authorized to be present and employed in the United States during the backpay period and thus entitled to backpay. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 1:47 am by Kevin LaCroix
 A ruling by the United States Supreme Court near the end of the savings and loan litigation, however, has reopened the door to these defenses. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:16 am by John Elwood
The opinion has more references to Justice Roberts, the author of 1936’s United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 5:34 pm by David Kopel
In other words, "the sorts of weapons protected were those 'in common use at the time.'" Id. at 627 (quoting United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:54 pm by Lisa A. Mazzie
    The lifting of the ban places the United States with roughly a dozen other countries that allow women to serve as part of combat units, including Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Israel, New Zealand, and Norway. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 6:49 am by Marcia Coyle
” Justice Scalia gave as an example the court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am by INFORRM
But there is no compelling reason to introduce a “public figure” limitation in libel cases, as applies in the United States of America. (3) The defence of “truth” The burden of proving that what has been published is substantially true remains on the defendant. [read post]