Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 8001 - 8020 of 9,848
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2010, 7:39 am by Kevin Schad appellate division SDOH
United States, 129 S.Ct. 695 (2009), the Court could not longer find that a presumption of suppression, based upon a Fourth Amendment violation, applied. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:49 pm by Robert Oszakiewski
The import site, in some cases, may be the organization's headquarters in the United States. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm by Bexis
We disagree.In Hoffman, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit applied Pennsylvania law and concluded that there was sufficient evidence for the jury to find that the manufacturer failed to adequately test its drug to discover potentially harmful side-effects. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 4:48 pm by Steven G. Pearl
., yesterday asked the Supreme Court of the United States to review the Ninth Circuit's en banc decision in Dukes v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:03 pm by Jeffrey B. Gracer
In a significant and surprising development, on August 24 the Solicitor General of the United States filed a brief in the Supreme Court asserting that a groundbreaking climate change decision by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals should be vacated and remanded for further consideration. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 10:19 pm
The chains failed to meet this burden. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 10:54 am by Lyle Denniston
   “The Clerk of Court,” the judge wrote, “is directed to file a copy of this order on the docket and forward this order to the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Justice Department announced that Plains All American Pipeline and several of its operating subsidiaries have agreed to spend approximately $41 million to upgrade 10,420 miles of crude oil pipeline operated in the United States. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am by Kelly
Diamond Innovations Inc (EDTexweblog.com) (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania will revisit and reconsider the standing issue in false marking case: United States of America ex rel FLFMC, LLC v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 10:07 am
The United States Congress has declared that the purpose of the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), located in Chapter 28 of Title 29 of the U.S. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 3:14 am by David Bernstein
An example of where the Court could have exhibited more deference than it did was United States v. [read post]