Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20" Results 8021 - 8040 of 8,963
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2018, 3:14 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  This means that a Section 17(b) violation does not require a finding of fault (such as negligence or tortious intent). [read post]
23 May 2022, 5:57 am by Kristy Parker
§ 1512(c)(2) makes it a crime punishable by up to 20 years in prison for anyone who “corruptly … obstructs, influences, or impedes an official proceeding, or attempts to do so. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 1:23 pm
In response, Claimants stated among other things, that because the class action does not involve the same claims or the same defendants, and because Claimants have already opted-out of the claims against Respondent in any class action, Respondent's Motion to Dismiss should be denied. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
A sports spectator assumes similar risks as does a sports participant. [35] Courts usually conclude that a “spectator has a duty to protect himself or herself not only against the dangers of which he or she has actual knowledge but also against such dangers incident to the game as would be apparent to a reasonable person in the exercise of due care. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
This question has famously been at the center of the debates about platform content moderation,[1] but it can come up in other contexts as well.[2] This is a broad question, and there might be no general answer. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 12:00 pm by Charles Johnson
 You DO want a DWI lawyer who is passionate about defending DWI cases. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am by Eugene Volokh
Because of the limited punishments that can be imposed, "[c]riminal defamation defendants are not entitled to a trial by jury" and "state law does not afford indigent criminal defamation defendants the right to court-appointed counsel. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 7:21 am by RobKornfeld
The record does not indicate which New York case the court was referring to. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 4:31 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
” The Teeter Court also held that the partnership dissolved by operation of law under Section 62 (1) (b) of the Partnership Law when the plaintiffs withdrew – before plaintiffs sued to declare it dissolved – so they did not breach the partnership agreement’s anti-dissolution provision. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Even so, and notwithstanding that the shooting has been officially deemed an assassination attempt, the word “assassination” does not necessarily imply a political component.The website dictionary.com, for example, offers two definitions: (1) “the premeditated act of killing someone suddenly or secretively, especially a prominent person”; and (2) “the act of destroying or harming treacherously and viciously. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 10:05 am by justinsilverman
Under Brandenburg, speech can be prohibited if (1) it is “directed at inciting or producing imminent lawless action” and (2) it is “likely to incite or produce such action. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 7:39 am
Similarly, predation does not pose a significant threat to the NRM DPS. [read post]