Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges"
Results 8021 - 8040
of 9,821
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2010, 3:39 am
The opinion (written by a Magistrate Judge and later adopted by the District Judge on June 22, 2010) is a microcosm for some of our favorite themes. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 7:28 am
Well we’re happy to report, based upon that most recent Bartlett opinion, that this fear appears unfounded. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 9:03 pm
The “SPEECH Act” – designed to prevent “non-First Amendment friendly” libel judgments in foreign courts being enforced in the United States was unanimously approved by the US Senate. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 8:15 pm
See In re Clay, 966 F.2d at 659. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 3:47 am
I know, the cop said so and you're a judge and have to validate whatever a cop says. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 5:14 pm
The act also was to be retroactive, causing a re-classification of the nearly 26,000 offenders designated under Megan. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 4:56 pm
Igasaki, Chair & Chief Judge Administrative Review Board U.S. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 10:33 am
As mental as this seems, the law was really designed to cut down on the growing prostitution problem going on in the city. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 4:38 am
But with that limitation, a noteworthy decision is In re Vioxx Products Liab. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 7:00 pm
The report notes that some councils use terms and procedures commonly associated with the civil law, calling tribunal members ‘judges’, councils ‘courts’ and requiring disputants to sign agreements which purport to give their decisions binding. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 9:02 am
The design and purpose of social media sites make them especially fertile ground for “statements involving observations of events surrounding us, statements regarding how we feel, our plans and motives, and our feelings (emotional and physical)[.] [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 8:28 am
This is simply another delay tactic, designed to cost the defendants more time and more money. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 5:30 am
I don’t think proactive analyses present a conundrum if they’re done under the auspices of legal counsel. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 9:31 pm
Below is a summary of the three points made by the brief, and my thoughts on each.First, the state argues that the perspective for judging whether a statement is testimonial should be an objective one. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:35 am
A re-trial was ordered. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 5:27 pm
” Before Judge Koeltl ruled, Ms. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:43 am
But presumably Mike Judge — the genius behind "Beavis and Butt-head" — will find new ways to make it good. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
Practically the only way that it falls short is that for some inexplicable reason it’s designated “not for publication. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 1:33 pm
Judging from these, the agency’s approach seems to be one we can get behind: Sunlight, to paraphrase the late, great Supreme Court justice, Louis Brandeis, makes a great disinfectant. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am
The truth or falsity of the information is an irrelevant inquiry in deciding whether the information is entitled to be protected and judges should be chary of becoming side-tracked into that irrelevant inquiry [86] The second is the authoritative decision of the United Kingdom Supreme Court (In re Guardian News and Media Ltd & Others [2010] UKSC 1), in light of the (reasonably) clear and consistent jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) (See eg Europapress… [read post]
