Search for: "Label v Label"
Results 8021 - 8040
of 13,306
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2020, 1:27 pm
For example, the court mentions Chavez v. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 2:18 am
[TTABlog Note: See the CAFC's decision in a companion case (here), holding that the term STEELBUILDING.COM is not generic for Applicant's services, but is merely descriptive and lacks secondary meaning.]April 18, 2007 - 2 PM: Diamonique Corp. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 1:17 pm
Kirk v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 10:52 am
Supreme Court in Mensing and Sorrell (here and here), and the Court’s decision to hear Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 3:42 pm
Hobbs and Miller v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 12:46 pm
" Harbison v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 11:57 am
Bush and Al-Odah v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 4:07 pm
Denmark, paragraph 45; and Case C-24/00 Commission v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 6:06 am
Anderson v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 10:55 pm
In its 2011 ruling in UMG v Augusto, the US District Court for the Ninth Circuit recalled in fact that "the mere labeling of an arrangement as a license rather than a sale, although it [is] a factor to be considered, [is] not by itself dispositive of the issue [as to whether the first sale doctrine may apply]". [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 3:00 am
Here is the opinion: Free Speech Coalition v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 7:33 am
Celestino v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 12:51 pm
Terry v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 9:13 pm
" But things didn't play out this way in a recent San Francisco case, Jankey v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 5:31 am
Floyd LJ held that parties should not abuse the confidential label, and should have “solid grounds” for designating material as AEO in order to protect their confidential information. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 10:00 pm
See Blain v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 9:34 pm
Export Finance Co Ltd[3] and Orion Finance Ltd v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 3:00 am
R. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 7:00 am
Barnett v. [read post]
