Search for: "Levell v. State" Results 8021 - 8040 of 29,839
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2019, 6:36 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Fast forward to 2019:  OIL attorneys simply cannot keep up quite as easily as before with the flood of immigration class actions and suits seeking to enjoin Executive Branch decisions to terminate Temporary Protected Status, DACA, and employment authorization for F-1 foreign students, and institute family-separation and child-imprisonment not to mention DOJ lawsuits asking federal courts to allow withholding of grant funds to sanctuary cities and states. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 6:36 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Fast forward to 2019:  OIL attorneys simply cannot keep up quite as easily as before with the flood of immigration class actions and suits seeking to enjoin Executive Branch decisions to terminate Temporary Protected Status, DACA, and employment authorization for F-1 foreign students, and institute family-separation and child-imprisonment not to mention DOJ lawsuits asking federal courts to allow withholding of grant funds to sanctuary cities and states. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 9:44 am by Michael A. Conforti
The panel held that the defendants did not satisfy the five Bauman factors required for a writ of mandamus, Bauman v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
   In referring to the recent TCL v Ericsson decision from the Central District of California (see Kat post here), Judge Labson stated:"The Court is not persuaded by Plaintiffs’ argument that summary judgment on Count III of the FAC is warranted. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 5:00 am by Annette Burns
The Court of Appeals decision in Amadore v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 5:00 am by Annette Burns
The Court of Appeals decision in Amadore v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 3:35 am by Matthew D. Donovan
A recent post-trial decision out of Delaware’s Court of Chancery, Personal Touch Holding Corp. v Glaubach, brings home this lesson with similar colloquial color. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 11:24 pm
Article 5(h) of that regulation again states that organic farming involves ‘the observance of a high level of animal welfare respecting species-specific needs”.The Court observed that the objective of the Regulations is to keep animal suffering to a minimum during the entire life of the animals, including during the  slaughtering process. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 8:20 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
This sentiment was supported by Justice Binnie in R. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 3:01 pm by Giles Peaker
Non-British applicants faced greater levels of refusal and those whose right to rent could not be straightforwardly demonstrated most of all. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 2:17 am
In this regard, the threshold for distinctiveness is not dependent on the public’s level of attention (Smart Technologies v OHIM, C‑311/11 P).Lack of distinctive character of the mark applied forAs regards the issue of distinctive character, the applicant maintained that the relevant public would perceive the mark as the letter ‘v’ for ‘vericiguat’ rather than a representation of a heart. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 12:14 pm by Eliot Kim
On Feb. 27, the Supreme Court issued a 7-1 opinion in Jam v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 11:00 am by Shriver Center
”The groundbreaking race equity work that RJI Fellows are doing at the local level is also being replicated state by state. [read post]