Search for: "Low v. Low" Results 8021 - 8040 of 15,415
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2024, 1:11 pm by Giles Peaker
FG, R (On the Application Of) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (2024) EWHC 780 (Admin) This was a judicial review of RBKC, asserting discrimination under the Equality Act 2010 in RBKC’s failure to make physical adaptations to a flat occupied by RBKC’s tenant, Ms FG, to meet her disability related needs. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 11:07 am by Giles Peaker
” The review decision found Ms Donaldson’s inquiries of the PCSO revealed that reported crime in the relevant area was low, with violent crime and threats of violence “almost non-existent. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 8:17 am
OHIM said that only hte city could bring such a claimKaren Millen Ltd v Dunnes Stores [2007] in the High Court of Ireland where Karen Millen's original purple low-V neck top and a striped princess cut button-down shirt was the subject of the dispute. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 9:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The Changing Landscape for Marketing Health and Nutrition Benefits, Part 2 Anne V. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 2:16 pm
A presumptive risk level of 1 (low risk), 2 (moderate risk), or 3 (high risk) is calculated for an offender by adding up the points assigned to the offender in each category. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 9:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Vicarious liability is about spreading—making the person with least incentive/low marginal utility of money pay. [read post]
2 May 2019, 10:48 am
  There has been a lot of important innovation since AIA - blockchain and AI to name but a couple of key areas, and the PTAB is important for getting rid of the “low hanging fruit” in terms “bad” patents. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:02 am by Nedim Malovic
The first and third questionsIn terms of assessing ‘genuine use’, the CJEU first noted that, according to Ansul BV v Ajax Brandbeveiliging BV (C–40/01), the fact that a mark is not used for goods newly available on the market but rather for goods that were sold in the past does not mean that its use is not genuine. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:26 am by Florian Mueller
Apple says in today's submission that Apple I and Apple II "cannot be reconciled with eBay Inc. v. [read post]