Search for: "Low v. Low" Results 8021 - 8040 of 15,558
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2014, 9:34 am by Gene Quinn
In the wake of the Supreme Court decision in Alice v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 2:47 am
Redefine Properties recently increased its direct holding in Australian-listed Cromwell Property Group.Economic factorsLow interest rates and inflation in Australia make property yields look more attractive, making a strong investment case in the country.Australia’s interest rates are still at a record low 2.5% while South Africa has so far seen a 75 basis points rise in interest rates.Investment analyst at Meago Asset Management Tsana Ramatswi says inflationary pressures have eased,… [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 5:43 am
SA's largest green building gets 6-star ratingCape Town has made green building history with the announcement by the Green Building Council of South Africa that No 1 Silo at the V&A Waterfront has been given the country's first 6-star Green Star SA 'As Built' rating.The No1 Silo office building at the V&A Waterfront.The announcement was made at FNB's Portside building during the Green Star Leadership Awards 2014, which form part of the Green… [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 7:44 am by Joy Waltemath
The parties were given “one final opportunity” to get it right (Lytle v Lowe’s Home Centers, Inc, September 8, 2014, Covington, V). [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 11:54 pm by Florian Mueller
Apple was in such a hurry that it immediately appealed the denial of a sales ban, but as I wrote on Thursday (when I reported on Apple's motion for postjudgment royalties of $6.46 per device that infringes the three patents underlying the liability findings), all the appeals relating to the second California Apple v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 5:33 am by Jim Sedor
Opponents argue the $200 threshold is so low it would be impossible for a group of people to run a quarter-page ad in their local newspaper without having to become a political committee. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 8:17 am by Francis Davey
Both were professors at the University of Cambridge but in different departments so that the argument might be characterised as Economics v Land Economy. [read post]