Search for: "Matter of Rules Adoption" Results 8021 - 8040 of 22,052
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2018, 4:01 pm by Christina Tellado and Deisy Castro
First, it addressed whether California’s wage and hour statutes or regulations adopted the FLSA’s de minimis doctrine. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 3:09 pm by Gail Cecchettini Whaley
Starbucks, the California Supreme Court held that California’s Labor Code and wage orders have not adopted the federal de minimis rule that excuses payment for small amounts of time when the employer can show these amounts are administratively difficult to keep track of. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 3:09 pm by Gail Cecchettini Whaley
Starbucks, the California Supreme Court held that California’s Labor Code and wage orders have not adopted the federal de minimis rule that excuses payment for small amounts of time when the employer can show these amounts are administratively difficult to keep track of. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 1:53 pm by Helena Okolicsanyi
Finally, in 2011, the FCC adopted rules governing formal complaints filed under Sections 255, 717, and 718 of the Act regarding violations of the FCC’s disability access rules. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am by Christopher Walker
Administrative law sets the ground rules for how federal agencies regulate and how courts review and constrain such agency action. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 10:13 am by H. Scott Leviant
  In other words, although California has not adopted the federal de minimis doctrine, does some version of the doctrine nonetheless apply to wage and hour claims as a matter of state law? [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
 While Canada adopted the intellectual methods and legal reasoning of a print-based legal system, it lagged behind in the establishment of print-based sources of legal information, with the result that the intellectual and institutional structures that derive from print media, and which are being displaced by digital media, were nowhere near as entrenched in Canadian law as compared with other common law jurisdictions. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 12:59 pm by Robert B. Lamm
” Instead, the SEC addressed the subject in the adopting release for the current executive compensation disclosure rules, and it has also been covered in numerous speeches and other statements over the years by members of the SEC staff. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 10:43 am
 According to the AG, there are two additional considerations that rule out copyright protection in a taste. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
But because they also were children of the adopting parent, the aunt, the rules applicable when two or more taxpayers can claim the same qualifying child would have needed to be examined.Two things matter. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Rather, as the court had indicated earlier in its opinion, "the arbitrator determined, under the specific facts of this case, that the penalty of termination could not be upheld" and did not adopt any new rules that Employer must follow in future disciplinary cases. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 1:31 pm by Francis Pileggi
Also, the new Order requires trial courts to “consider adopting” practices and policies that disfavor: (i) filing due dates on Mondays or the day after a holiday in non-expedited matters; (ii) the issuance of non-expedited opinions addressing dispositive motions or post-trial relief after 4:00 p.m. as a general matter, and afternoons on Fridays; and (iii) the scheduling of oral arguments and trials in August, except in expedited matters or if there is… [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 12:04 pm by Eric Citron
As an initial matter, it’s useful to point out that the “major rules” doctrine is itself somewhat controversial. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:15 am by Eric Goldman
” The bolded phrase is clearly missing words. 1798.180 says: “This title is a matter of statewide concern and supersedes and preempts all rules, regulations, codes, ordinances, and other laws adopted by a city, county, city and county, municipality, or local agency regarding the collection and sale of consumers’ personal information by a business. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 7:13 am by Joy Waltemath
As an initial matter, the employer did not dispute that its no-solicitation/no-distribution policy was unlawfully overbroad in violation of Section 8(a)(1). [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 1:11 am by Jani Ihalainen
The matter started nearly 5 years ago, and only recently found its ultimate conclusion. [read post]