Search for: "State v. A. T. D." Results 8021 - 8040 of 23,982
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2009, 3:45 am
On Monday, in Caperton v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 4:30 am by Frances G. Zacher
" The United States District Court for the District of Colorado was faced with just that question in the recently decided Zapien v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Terry Hart
But first, I’d like to look at the concept of “genius. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
Howard Wasserman has this blog’s analysis of Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:47 am by Dave
That proposition was effectively trumped by Terry Gallivan, Counsel for Islington, who relied on the contrary proposition in Akinbolu v Hackney LBC (1997) 29 HLR 259, 269 as well as that old chestnut R v Sec of State for the Environment ex p Tower Hamlets LBC [1993] QB 632, 643, neither of which had been cited to Collins J. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:47 am by Dave
That proposition was effectively trumped by Terry Gallivan, Counsel for Islington, who relied on the contrary proposition in Akinbolu v Hackney LBC (1997) 29 HLR 259, 269 as well as that old chestnut R v Sec of State for the Environment ex p Tower Hamlets LBC [1993] QB 632, 643, neither of which had been cited to Collins J. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 4:43 am by Susan Brenner
  [A[lthough `[t]he simple existence of some statutory ambiguity is not sufficient’ to trigger automatic resolution of the ambiguity in favor of a defendant, U.S. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
  The Decherts are too involved in this litigation to comment publicly.There aren’t many research-oriented pharmaceutical companies based in Alabama, and after last week’s execrable decision in Wyeth, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 5:57 am
You just have to look to the Second Circuit's opinion, Riegel v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed at Bloomberg View, Noah Feldman discusses Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]