Search for: "State v. Congress"
Results 8021 - 8040
of 29,298
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
Constitution states, “The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes…. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 4:07 am
” Additional coverage of the solicitor general’s motion in United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 9:16 am
E.g., United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 9:00 am
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Barr v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:21 pm
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 6:52 am
It is debate that this decision abrogates last year’s decision of the New York State Appellate Division in Gold v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
On Oct. 5, the Fifth Circuit held in Texas v. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 3:40 pm
Cuomo v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 12:17 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:41 pm
On March 22, 2017, the United States Supreme Court, in an opinion written by Justice Clarence Thomas in Star Athletic, LLC v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:41 pm
On March 22, 2017, the United States Supreme Court, in an opinion written by Justice Clarence Thomas in Star Athletic, LLC v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 11:06 am
Here are a few quick running thoughts from today's oral argument in Gill v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:08 am
This is the system Congress hath wrought. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 8:40 am
That’s simply not how the constitutional separation of powers works: The administrative state, however one feels about it, was constructed by the joint efforts of Congress and the president; this means that any lawful attempt at its “deconstruction” will require the labors of both branches as well. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 5:44 pm
Here's the abstract:In Watters v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
”[33] Congress very clearly did not intend for the critical terms in [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 1:34 pm
In 1803, Chief Justice John Marshall, in the case Marbury v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:47 pm
" U.S. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:47 am
It adopts a default rule that no GTMO detainee can be transferred to another country’s custody, except pursuant to a handful of narrow exceptions: Certification from the Secretary of Defense: A transfer is permitted if the Secretary of Defense (after consulting with the DNI, and upon obtaining the concurrence of the Secretary of State) can send to Congress (30 days in advance of the transfer) a certification that the receiving state (i) is not a… [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 2:33 pm
United States mirrors the claims from Trump impeachment 1.0] In Trump v. [read post]
