Search for: "State v. Levell "
Results 8021 - 8040
of 29,481
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2021, 8:42 am
” As law professor Joanna Schwartz explains, Hope v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 5:03 am
First, it is time to reconsider the act of state doctrine. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 10:48 am
People v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:55 am
HAVENNER, Appellant, v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 1:30 am
Wilkinson v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 3:52 am
These rules, generally, are at the state law level, and accordingly do vary from state to state. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 9:49 am
In Shaver v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
Today we look at a sister case, Harrington v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 5:51 pm
The Court was also unimpressed by the defendants’ point that other generally indicated facts were truly stated. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 2:42 am
See United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 9:00 am
The Frye standard states that an expert opinion "must be shown to be generally accepted as reliable. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 5:17 am
One case currently being litigated, Caner v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 9:10 am
Jackson Women’s Health Organization that allowing state legislatures to create their own abortion regimes would enhance democracy and would allow the Supreme Court to be “scrupulously neutral” — returning abortion to the states would actually be antidemocratic, because gerrymandering at the state district level, sustained by the Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Rucho v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 9:37 am
Texas v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 4:36 pm
In Baker v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:08 am
U.S. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 11:28 am
A prosecution at the state level does not preclude another prosecution at the federal level pursuant to the doctrine of dual sovereignty. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 5:07 am
Alvarez v. 40 Mulberry Restaurant, Inc. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:17 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
Essentially, the states are asking the judiciary to overturn a landmark Supreme Court decision Garcia v. [read post]