Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 8021 - 8040
of 11,993
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
Myrick v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 6:25 am
The recent criminal case of R. v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
: Warner Bros v V G Santosh (Spicy IP) Where do we go? [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 4:41 pm
Hainan Provincial Price Bureau. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm
Palmer used twitter to announce his plan to sue after the state election. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm
Jeffrey Prince, Indiana University – Kelley School of Business – Department of Business Economics & Public Policy, Scott Wallsten, Technology Policy Institute Protecting Our Digital Identity: The Argument for Adopting Uniform Privacy Laws in the United States, Rebecca Cooper, Independent The Need to Protect Freedom of Expression on the Internet through a Human Rights-Based in Indonesia, Anak Agung Ayu Nanda Saraswati, University of Brawijaya Next Week in the Courts On 9… [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 7:46 pm
*This is the fourth post in a symposium on William Novak’s New Democracy: The Creation of the Modern American State. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 10:28 am
In Quickturn Design Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 5:20 am
” Cobb v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:00 am
In Yee v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:37 am
Although not enforceable in every state, many states, including Florida, will enforce a pay if paid provision if it clearly and unambiguously states the intent to shift the risk of nonpayment by the owner to the subcontractor. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 12:24 pm
In the United States, this is the Schedule K-1. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 6:34 pm
They not only provide “authority” for your position on price, but they carry the weight of other people’s valuation. [read post]
9 May 2022, 8:51 am
” Referring to the now-defunct Interstate Commerce Commission and Civil Aeronautics Board, she noted “the disastrous regulatory frameworks in the transportation industry teach the attentive student that rules stifle innovation, increase costs, raise prices, limit choice, and decrease output, frequently harming the very parties they are intended to benefit, and the benefits that flowed to consumers when competition replaced regulation in transportation. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
In 1968, a court decision, Escott v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 8:21 am
State v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark's new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION - the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: KINDER vs TIMI… [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 12:00 pm
County of Prince William, 89 F.3d 169, 171-72 (4th Cir. 1996); Price v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 9:44 pm
The PUC, however, declined to announce such a price — so the parties fell back to the $50 figure. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark’s new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION – the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v… [read post]
