Search for: "State v. White"
Results 8021 - 8040
of 13,748
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2014, 4:57 am
Transparency is the precursor of accountability, so let us keep the ball rolling.Filed under: National Security, Public International Law Tagged: imminence, International law, self-defense, targeted killings, transparency, united states, White Paper [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:35 am
Heath Abshure, president of the North American Securities Administrators Association, an organization of state securities regulators. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 6:28 am
” She stated, “If I’m forced to waive a white flag to prove I’m a team player and help my fellow TM, I will consider doing it. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 6:15 am
I wrote yesterday why Congress may have the better of the separation of powers arguments in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:49 am
Assuming he’s indigent, he’s probably entitled to a turtleneck at state expense – just basic white, though, not an artsy black one like Steve Jobs used to wear. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:20 am
Beverly Mann of Angry Bear discusses both Schuette and Wednesday’s decision in the habeas case White v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 7:08 pm
In today’s decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:59 am
Professor Barnett builds his radically individualistic view of popular sovereignty on Chisholm v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:46 am
On Wednesday, in White v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:19 am
United States, involving restitution for victims of child pornography; and White v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 5:38 am
(The other was a terrible decision reversing a grant of habeas corpus relief from the 6th Circuit, White v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 4:37 am
But in essence, the court declines to decide whether these statements are sufficient to constitute waiver, since the DOJ White Paper does the trick. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
Using the example of R. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
That is what the Court said in Buckley v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 5:04 pm
Angelone, 530 U.S. 156 (2000) sloppily and needlessly paraphrased that language in a case where the state court decision was entirely reasonable and there was no need to decide whether the "extension" gloss on "unreasonable application" was proper.Today in White v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:33 pm
Constitution (Gratz v Bollinger, 84 EPD ¶41,416). [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 1:22 pm
Now, with Navarette v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 12:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 10:04 am
In a Sixth circuit opinion called US v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 7:16 am
The opinion in White v. [read post]
