Search for: "United States v. Close"
Results 8021 - 8040
of 14,200
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2014, 11:37 am
It was Arzú who had just persuaded the United Nations to take Guatemala off its blacklist. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:16 pm
Sibelius v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 2:39 pm
Many readers will be aware that the United States has no generalized protection for moral rights in its copyright law – and, arguably, after the Dastar case, no strong alternative doctrine for the protection of an author’s right to attribution and the integrity of his or her work, either. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
For example, the New Deal/Civil Rights legacy may well give new support to religious conservatives, like Michael McConnell, who argue that the pervasive state interventionism of the modern era require a change in the constitutional base-line for assessing religious access to public facilities and subsidies. [read post]
21 May 2014, 12:03 pm
” It also prohibits the use of any communication that is not “to, from, or about the target” but “is to or from an identifiable United States person believed to be located in the United States”—unless there is “an immediate threat to human life. [read post]
21 May 2014, 9:21 am
Fardon, United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois; Robert J. [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
United States v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 4:46 am
In 2009, Scott filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy and in January of 2010 he met with the “Trustee for the United States, the Trustee's counsel, and the Trustee's accounting firm, Verdolino & Lowey (V & L). [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:29 pm
At this time of year, when the American Law Institute, "the leading independent organization in the United States producing scholarly work to clarify, modernize, and otherwise improve the law" (ALI About), holds its annual meeting in Washington D.C., to note the publication of a very interesting set of articles in a symposium, a "Restatement of. . . [read post]
20 May 2014, 3:06 pm
Recently, the United States District Court for the District of Montana ordered (pdf) the U.S. [read post]
20 May 2014, 11:04 am
In Baker v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:45 pm
United States 13-983Issue: Whether, consistent with the First Amendment and Virginia v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 4:18 am
United States, “which certainly seems possible based on the oral argument, it will cap off a terrible decade for the Executive Branch in foreign relations cases before the Supreme Court. [read post]
16 May 2014, 1:30 pm
” The new version simply stated: “Our Precedent. [read post]
16 May 2014, 11:02 am
United States. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:06 am
See Hill v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:00 am
Employersyand fiduciaries of 401(k) plans should take note of the potential need to adopt a mid-year amendment to their plans to comply with new guidance of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) concerning the need to timely amend their plans to comply with IRS recent guidance on when their plans must afford same-sex partners treatment equivalent to opposite-sex married couples issued in response to the Supreme Court’s decision striking down the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in… [read post]
15 May 2014, 7:15 am
Esplanade Ridge Civic Ass’n v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 9:46 pm
For those who don't know the name, Ted Olson is a partner at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, a former Solicitor General of the United States, winner of Bush v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Hobby Lobby’s interpretation that it does would open the floodgates to exempt every business owner in the United States from the anti-discrimination laws, because there is no real middle ground. [read post]
