Search for: "United States v. Heard"
Results 8021 - 8040
of 8,393
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2008, 12:16 pm
On February 26, 2008 the Supreme Court heard oral argument on a case involving the issue of presentment under the False Claims Act: Allison Engine Co. v. the United States. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 6:29 am
Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling in Sprint/United Management Co. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 12:09 pm
Sprint/United Management Co. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 6:25 pm
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday heard oral arguments [transcript, PDF] in Cuellar v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:08 am
See Swann v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 6:00 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 7:19 pm
Mordenti v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
KG v Lajos Kiss, Delux Befektetes: (Class 46),WIPO: domain name audiexperience.com should be transferred to Audi: Audi AG v Mike Gillespie, Gillespie Auto Group: (Class 46),WIPO: Financial magazine The Economist fails in attempt to gain control of domain name theeconomist.com because registrant had not heard of the magazine at time of registration: (Out-Law),Domain hijacking: (Dilanchian),Animals in trade mark design? [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 6:47 am
United States in a post here called “Practice Pointer: Navigating a Novel Cert. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 2:00 pm
The new appeal is Gates v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 9:08 pm
Noriega's case will be heard by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals on January 14, 2009.The Editor interviews Miami Attorney Jon May, who represented General Manuel Noriega at trial and on appeal (along with Attorney Frank Rubino).Some background: In United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 11:01 pm
And that's what I conveyed in the letter to the United States Attorney, that that was where our concern was coming from. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 9:33 am
The Sixth Circuit affirmed a judgment (including attorney's fees) against a father who claimed that permitting a woman, but not a man, to terminate a pregnancy violates the equal protection clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 11:24 am
I mean, let's face it, damages in Chinese tort and IP cases are far far lower than in such cases in the United States and go ahead and try to get lost profits in a Chinese breach of contract case. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 12:30 am
Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 3:23 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:20 am
King Billable Hour v. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:39 am
As such, the United States is not able to decide, as of the Court's deadline, whether to proceed with the action. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 8:36 pm
See United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 2:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
