Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 8021 - 8040 of 10,394
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2011, 6:43 am by Susan Brenner
In August 2007, after viewing the images, NCMEC referred the matter to the Maine State Police Computer Crimes Unit (MSPCCU), directing MSPCCU to images associated with the `lilhottyohh’ screen name as well as those associated with a second screen name, `lilhottee00000. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 10:24 pm by Marie Louise
HIS (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) ivi – Web site that rebroadcasts TV should be allowed to operate, groups tell NY court : WPIX et al v ivi (Public Knowledge) Mick Haig Productions – Copyright troll gives up in porn-downloading case (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (TorrentFreak) (ArsTechnica) (Plagiarism Today) Perfect 10 – Megaupload targeted in multi-million dollar lawsuit (TorrentFreak) Sony – Sony granted temporary restraining order against PS3 hacker… [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 1:56 am
EPE stood its ground, also stating that it had built up significant goodwill in its trade marks and logos to the extent that a substantial body of the public, upon seeing those marks and logos, would believe those goods or services to be those of EPE and its lawful licensees. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm by Law Lady
 Billing Fraud: VIRGINIA FEDERAL JUDGE WON'T DISMISS MEDICARE FRAUD DEFENDANTS, United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:19 am by Kelly
Bausch & Lomb, Inc (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Release of false marking claims applies to all products marked with patent mumbers: Simonian v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 8:17 am
(Picture, top left - the AmeriKat hiding in her shopping bag after a long afternoon browsing)RIAA lawyer to be next US Solicitor GeneralAnother change was announced last week when President Obama (right) nominated Donald Verrilli as the next United States Solicitor General. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:45 pm by Katie Smith, ACLU
This Week on the Blog of Rights Last Saturday marked the 38th anniversary of the Supreme Court decision in Roe v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:57 am by Colin Murray
It is wishful thinking, therefore, to argue, as  Stewart Jackson (Peterborough) (Con) does, that: Is not it true that the recent case of Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingdom specifically allows the Government to proceed with a range of policy options, which, like the consultation in 2009, could be put out for public discussion? [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 10:01 pm by Marie Louise
(TorrentFreak) Google starts censoring BitTorrent, RapidShare and more (TorrentFreak) Global – Trade Marks & Domain Names Rogue websites: a problem … and a prize – WIPO and WIPD (IPKat) Big content to ICANN: Make it easier for us to challenge domain suffixes (Plagiarism Today) Global – Patents Patent sellers can learn from Apple’s marketing strategy (ipeg) Bulgaria BitTorrent sites hacked by secret Government unit? [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:35 pm
The RecordTV v MediaCorp TV Singapore (2010) case was cited. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 2:46 am by John L. Welch
” The TDRA does not define the term “mark,” and so the Board looked to Section 45 of the Act for its meaning of “mark,” concluding that it must “at least recognize the possibility that, in an unusual case, activity outside the United States related to a mark could potentially result in the mark becoming well-known within the United States, even without any form of activity in the… [read post]