Search for: "United States v. Place"
Results 8021 - 8040
of 23,717
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2018, 8:35 pm
It is also possible that the Trump administration (which is no fan of Obamacare) will choose not to defend the constitutionality of the mandate, in which case the court might appoint an independent lawyer to defend the statute (as it did in the 1982 Bob Jones case) or allow blue states to step in to defend (as lawyers hired by mostly Republican members Congress were allowed to step in to defend a provision of the Defense of Marriage Act, which the Obama administration refused to defend in… [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 1:55 pm
United States, 561 U.S. 358, 408–09 (limiting the reach of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 11:26 am
On Monday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit became the second federal appeals court to rule that Title VII encompasses sexual orientation discrimination in Zarda v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 10:58 am
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 7:00 am
Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:12 am
It also addresses whether certain criminal proceedings in which third parties claim an interest in forfeited property are civil or criminal.The case is United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:30 am
The majority opinion, after 14 pages of opining how the ATS does not apply to human rights violations occurring outside the United States, added: “[o]n these facts, all the relevant conduct took place outside the United States. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am
The first was United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:43 pm
Many of these individuals sought asylum in the United States based on a credible fear of persecution. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:41 pm
Reilly (2001) (tobacco advertising); United Staets v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 3:59 pm
As Rogan rightly states, “In Sen’s work, the two critiques [i.e., the ‘moral’ and the ‘material’] of capitalism cooperate. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 1:38 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare In preparation for Tuesday’s oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 12:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 11:35 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument Tuesday morning in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 10:44 am
Chicago Bridge & Iron Co., 735 F.3d 131 (3d Cir. 2013) and United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 10:44 am
Chicago Bridge & Iron Co., 735 F.3d 131 (3d Cir. 2013) and United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 5:00 pm
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 12:35 pm
The act must have occurred outside the United States, but must be an act that would have violated federal or state law if it were committed in the United St [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 12:23 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral argument today in Janus v. [read post]
