Search for: "Doe, Appeal of" Results 8041 - 8060 of 108,036
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2016, 6:08 am by Steven Wildberger
Ritz [SCOTUSblog materials] that "actual fraud," as it relates to the discharge of debt under the bankruptcy code, may be committed by purposeful concealment and does not require overt misrepresentation. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 8:14 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
§ 801.05(1)(d), does not subject Nissan Japan to personal jurisdiction in Wisconsin. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 4:15 am by Joseph Robinson
Dissenting-in-part, Judge Mayer would have held that the Court does not have jurisdiction to review a... [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 11:01 am by Steve Lash
The Court of Appeals agreed Wednesday to review a lower court decision that the symbol does not ... [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 9:27 am by Daniel Miller
The California Court of Appeal, First District, recently held that a qui tam plaintiff may pursue a California False Claims Act (CFCA) action predicated on a bank’s failure to report and deliver escheated property, even if the California State Controller does not provide appropriate notice to the bank under California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1576. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 5:32 am
The Maryland Court of Appeals affirmed a P.G. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 3:54 pm by Keith Wier
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit determined that settlement of an FDCPA claim does not trigger an attorney fee award, examined third-party contact as a "communication" under the FDCPA, and ruled there was no "partial surrender" of collateral in a Chapter 13 plan. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 4:51 am
June 25, 2007The Web wasn't created to appeal to our sense of voyeurism. [read post]
22 Jan 2003, 11:29 am
Holley [PDF opinion] - Opinion by Breyer, vacating and remanding to the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 9:15 am by IPWatchdog
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on Monday ruled that California common law on copyright protection does not include a right of public performance, reversing a partial summary judgment for Flo & Eddie, which controls the rights to the songs of the rock band the Turtles. [read post]
18 May 2012, 12:07 pm by Jaclyn Belczyk
[JURIST] The Maryland Court of Appeals [official website], the state's highest court, ruled [opinion, PDF] Friday that a lesbian couple legally married in California can get a divorce in Maryland. [read post]
30 May 2008, 11:05 am
A month after an appeals court confirmed that Dish Network's DVR software had indeed violated a TiVo patent, Dish is retaliating with a lawsuit of its own. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 8:32 am
[JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit [official website] ruled [decision, PDF] Thursday that a Pennsylvania law imposing reporting and curriculum review requirements on parents who home school their children does not violate federal freedom of religion protections. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 5:27 am by Matt Glenn
[JURIST] A US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit [official website] panel ruled [opinion, PDF] Tuesday that a school district's policy prohibiting the performance of religious holiday songs does not violate the First Amendment Establishment Clause [Cornell LII backgrounder]. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
 The fact that she became a Seventh Day Adventist some three months after she took her job does not change the result. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court granted certification on February 3 to review the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s decision in In re PennEast Pipeline Co. in order to resolve an important question: Does the Natural Gas Act (NGA) delegate authority to exercise the federal government’s eminent domain power to condemn land in which a state claims an interest when FERC grants a certificate of public convenience and necessity for an interstate pipeline project? [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 1:36 pm by Kelley Godfrey
The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts recently heard an appeal regarding a particularly obstinate insured, ruling that recognition of a consent-to-settle provision does not in and of itself violate an insurer’s duties under Massachusetts’ claim settlement practices statute. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Software developers should take note of a recent English Court of Appeal decision. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 6:40 am by Steve Lash
Police officers’ discovery of small amounts of in a resident’s discarded trash does not justify a warrant to search the entire house, a federal appeals court said last week in ruling that guns found in a Fort Washington home cannot be introduced as evidence at the owner’s criminal trial. [read post]