Search for: "Doe, Appeal of"
Results 8041 - 8060
of 108,036
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2023, 8:55 am
The three-judge panel held that the mere issuance of the Direct Oversight Determination does not trigger the due process protections that were established in Kimber. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 8:55 am
The three-judge panel held that the mere issuance of the Direct Oversight Determination does not trigger the due process protections that were established in Kimber. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 8:30 am
The Court of Appeals found no error. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 7:16 am
“While the underlying merits of the District Court’s summary judgment order are pertinent to that analysis, the Court does not grant review of those merits, which have not yet been addressed by the Court of Appeals,” the majority wrote. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 7:15 am
Likewise, while this appeal was originally docketed under the caption "In re: Jane Doe," we deem it appropriate to refer to Demetriades by her real name in this Opinion. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 6:33 am
” But they noted that “the Courts of Appeals have uniformly taken our continuing silence” after Watts “to suggest that the Constitution does permit otherwise unreasonable sentences supported by judicial factfinding, so long as they are within the statutory range. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 5:47 am
Either side still may decide to further appeal this decision, first to the full D.C. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 5:47 am
Either side still may decide to further appeal this decision, first to the full D.C. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 4:19 am
The TTAB recently ruled on the appeals from the three Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusals summarized below. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 1:36 am
The rate of return on individual appeals is falling compared to a few years ago, as candidates and outside groups find themselves targeting the same pool of donors. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 11:43 pm
The court’s attention was apparently not drawn to and the court did not remark on the fact that section 51 of the Consumer Protection Act does not permit a disclaimer of liability for gross negligence. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 6:24 pm
Apple’s appeal to the Supreme Court argues that the Federal Circuit misconstrued the statute. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 4:33 pm
The first is that there is no appeals process, and most arbitration agreements require both parties to abide by the decision of the arbitrator. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 2:36 pm
As the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals has recently explained, "[o]ur nation's long-held First Amendment protection for parody does not rise and fall with whether a few people are confused. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 2:05 pm
Factor 4—Because student-athletes often spend more than 30 hours per week on their sport and because their schedules often bar them from taking certain classes or majoring in certain subjects, participation in intercollegiate sports does not accommodate their academic pursuits. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 1:17 pm
Stillwater filed an appeal. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 12:53 pm
Lafley & Roger Martin The word “strategy” is thrown around a lot, but what does it really mean? [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 12:16 pm
Does spinal injury count as a disability? [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 11:57 am
This argument may have an initial intuitive appeal, but it is a false analogue. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 11:41 am
Antitrust Matters provides engaging and timely conversations about competition policy in the digital age. [read post]
