Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V" Results 8041 - 8060 of 12,272
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2012, 11:15 am by Mark Tabakman
When I begin defending a Fair Labor Standards Act collective action, one of the first strategies I look for is to find some way to kick the named plaintiff out of the lawsuit, whether through, perhaps, a Rule 68 Offer of Judgment or a contention that they are not a valid part of the lawsuit and so the whole thing must go away. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 6:00 am by ERIC J DIRGA PA
This record will show that on a specific date before the arrest the defendant’s license was suspended for a period of time that extended through the date of arrest. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 9:27 am by Matt C. Bailey
Moreover, although Defendant questions Plaintiff's proof, Defendant does not actually dispute any of these numbers or claims. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Both parties appealed (I looked at the issues on appeal in a previous post). [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 5:12 pm by INFORRM
What, it is sometimes wondered, does a claim under the DPA add which is not already covered by claims under Article 8, defamation and so on? [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:00 am by Bruce E. Boyden
In my previous post, I dissected the problematic recent Seventh Circuit copyright decision in Peters v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 1:59 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Mann thinks so, and has threatened to sue if NRO does not remove the offending blog post. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:17 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Pa. 2004) (a case my partner Tim Foley and I defended and prevailed in). [read post]