Search for: "Does, 1-25"
Results 8041 - 8060
of 18,563
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2024, 9:50 pm
A copy of the March 25, 2024, complaint can be found here. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Although the Agenda includes rules that might regulate crypto protocols or platforms through an unmarked backdoor,[21] it does not appear to include any rules primarily intended to grapple with the main regulatory questions that have arisen around these assets.[22] II. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:09 pm
The exemption does not apply if installation of the system at an existing parking lot would involve: Removal or a tree required pursuant to local, state, or federal requirements, unless the tree dies and there is no requirement to replace it; or Removal of a native tree over 25 years old. [read post]
26 Jul 2006, 4:06 pm
Although 521(a)(1) (which used to be numbered as 521(1)) requires the filing of certain documents, they do not include the counseling certificate. 521(b)(1), though, does require the filing of a certificate from the counseling agency that counseling has been completed. [read post]
26 Jul 2006, 4:06 pm
Although 521(a)(1) (which used to be numbered as 521(1)) requires the filing of certain documents, they do not include the counseling certificate. 521(b)(1), though, does require the filing of a certificate from the counseling agency that counseling has been completed. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:59 am
§ 207(a)(1). [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 3:04 pm
Essentially, this criteria means that a person can continue to receive PEUC benefits rather than regular unemployment benefits if that person still has weeks remaining on their PEUC claim, their current benefit year does not expire until after 27 Dec. 2020, and the total weekly benefit amount in regular unemployment benefits is $25 less than what they are entitled to with their current PEUC benefits. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 7:08 pm
In depth 1. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 2:55 am
Table 1. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
(The August 25 Order also pushes back the date by which the district court is supposed to “resolve this matter” from October 1, 2023 to October 6, 2023, but also elaborates the deadline, saying that by October 6 the district court’s resolution needs to “include[e] entry of a final, appealable order, which shall set forth the court’s findings of facts and conclusions of law. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 10:34 am
The first is Jane Doe #1 v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:03 am
The FY 23 appropriations provision would be effective 90 days after enactment.According to the definition of “M&A broker,” such person must reasonably believe that: (1) upon consummation of the transaction, any person who acquires the securities/assets of an eligible privately-held company will control and actively manage the company; and (2) any person who is offered securities in exchange for the securities/assets of an eligible privately-held company will, before the… [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 12:03 pm
Pursuant to North Carolina General Statutes § 14-100, our Supreme Court has defined this offense as `(1) a false representation of a subsisting fact or a future fulfillment or event, (2) which is calculated and intended to deceive, (3) which does in fact deceive, and (4) by which one person obtains or attempts to obtain value from another. [read post]
31 May 2015, 5:02 am
The problem with that argument is that s. 3(1) CDPA makes no mention of embedded data. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 2:52 pm
§ 33- 1126(A)(1)Minor child’s earnings unless debt to be discharged was contracted for the special benefit of the minor child.A.R.S. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 7:58 am
What does this mean for the future SPC practice? [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 8:08 am
How does Murmurs know this? [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
The Constitution does not itself rank the rights and obligations it provides for, nor does it tell us how to divine any hierarchy. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 9:55 am
§ 353(b)(1), which does not include a list of drugs, and the Orange Book, which expressly includes Ritalin in its list of drugs. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 7:19 am
Does this clause trump the common-law rule? [read post]
