Search for: "Does 1-35" Results 8041 - 8060 of 9,553
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2010, 2:49 am by Hedge Fund Lawyer
Max 20% NAV issuer limit. 35% in exceptional circumstances. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:16 am
Agilent clarified that in interference proceedings, the Spina rule applies when a claim copied from another party's patent or application is challenged for lack of written description requirement support under § 112, ¶ 1, and the Rowe rule applies when the copied claim's validity under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
Once implemented, this legislation will ensure that the dominant industrial global food system is anointed as the only legitimate manner of food production and distribution, a deception that amounts to a covert continuation of the Enclosure Movement.[1]   Just as the Enclosure acts during the 17th through 19th centuries drove peasants off what was once communal land, the food safety legislation will serve to bar small- and medium-sized business people from engaging in food… [read post]
9 May 2010, 3:44 pm by Tom Goldstein
  I expect the vote to be 65-35. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm by Tom Goldstein
  She has thus worked in the process of governing and does not merely come from what has recently been criticized (unfairly, in my view) as the “judicial monastery. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:41 pm by Stephen Page
If the applicant does not prove the case, no protection order is made.3. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:22 pm by Eric Schweibenz
The motion focused on various limitations of the asserted claims, each of which Oki Data argued should be construed under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
7 May 2010, 11:11 am
In an appeal of a 35 U.S.C. [read post]
7 May 2010, 8:07 am
It has been widely reported that RIL prevailed by a majority of 2:1. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:38 pm by INFORRM
Article 10 does not, in the circumstances such as those of the present case, confer on an individual a right of access to a register containing information about his personal position, nor does it embody an obligation on the Government to impart such information to the individual” [74]. [read post]