Search for: "English v. English"
Results 8041 - 8060
of 11,204
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2015, 3:09 am
The AG OpinionIn his Opinion [not yet available in English, but summarised here] on 4 December 2014, Advocate General (AG) Cruz Villalón noted that the factual background here differed from the one at stake in Cassina [here, in which the CJEU held that "[t]he concept of distribution to the public, otherwise than through sale, ... applies only where there is a transfer of the ownership of that object. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:55 am
In this context, it may be interesting to see the approach that the UPC (and the English Courts, in some instances) will take with respect to these complicated and interesting issues in the near future. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 5:23 am
Contrary to those accounts, Brown v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 2:11 am
Bert has also tried sleeping on digital books,but he warns you that they are not as good as analogue ones for your backThe AG OpinionIPKat readers will remember the Opinion [another one not yet available in English!] [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 6:01 am
Even more so, when the email attaches a judgment that is short and easily digestible, as was the case in Mr Justice Arnold's decision in Napp v Dr Reddy's and Sandoz [2016] EWHC 493. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:45 am
Mr Justice Arnold of held that English contract law was controlling and that service of a notice of termination under the U.S. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
This SEC guidance, published in April 2019, seeks to provide “plain English” advice to would-be issuers as to when digital tokens qualify as securities and would thus fall under the purview of the SEC. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 2:39 pm
The Ciprianis: food, fun and fraud here Right Said Fred here and, for connoisseurs of English humour, here [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 5:38 am
UNDP, UNEP, UNFCCC, UN Global Compact, UNIDO) [the letter 'u' appears between those brackets more frequently than in the standard English Scrabble set, notes the IPKat] and the World Bank’s Climate Technology Program. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 10:58 am
Meanwhile in the UK the ISPs’ appeal to the Court of Appeal in Cartier v BSkyB (three judgments here, here and here) is pending. [read post]
7 Apr 2018, 7:30 am
Scott Harman summarized the proceedings in Doe v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 7:37 pm
The case of King v Burwell had reached the US Supreme Court because of the phrase "exchanges established by the state. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 12:47 pm
A procedural chart has been produced in English (NDFI About Us, Procedures). [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 5:38 am
Today, in Case T‑437/11 Golden Balls Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), Intra-Presse, the General Court of the European Union did something which it is rarely given credit for doing: it restored some sanity to this absurd and conceptually-driven world of European trade mark law. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 9:46 pm
It can be used in lieu of the traditional materials in legal English or similar approaches. [read post]
17 May 2013, 6:36 am
This promises to be a seriously internationally event, since there will be a discussion of the English and Scottish experience led by Mr Justice Birss and Lord Glennie. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 6:28 am
In light of the international importance of tackling non-contestable digital ecosystems, the Monopolies Commission published an official English translation (24 pages, PDF) of Chapter V on the potential need for further regulation. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:02 pm
Such is the case with Nature’s Touch Frozen Foods v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 1:43 am
• The practice in the Examination Guide, and the Registrar’s reliance on the NEYMAR case, both seem to be allowing assertion of rights in a personal name, but no such rights exist under English law. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 3:57 am
Shadi.com v. [read post]
