Search for: "Good v. Good"
Results 8041 - 8060
of 76,270
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2019, 1:45 pm
Obviously the result isn’t good for Facebook. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:27 am
The vast majority of Printify customers purchase directly from the merchant, the orders do not arrive in Printify packaging, and Printify does not otherwise “identif[y] the goods as its own. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 9:52 am
While some of these developments were good for Zazzle, this remains a terrible loss for Zazzle. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 10:22 am
This is a good example. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:39 am
Fair Isaac Corporation v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 1:12 am
He also saw that the classification of the goods does not necessarily have any legal consequences regarding the goods. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 2:49 am
The CA agreed that consumers of these goods were likely to be indifferent towards the marks used, as they would focus on the price and attributes of the goods rather than the marks. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 10:18 am
Ohio State Univ. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2022, 6:57 am
In addition, it also considered that the goods were aimed at consumers with a high level of attention since those goods are intended for business customers with specific professional expertise.Comparison of the signsThe distinctive and dominant elementsAfter considering that the goods were identical, the General Court moved on to assess the distinctive and dominant elements of the marks. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 4:11 am
IAC Search & Media, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 9:17 am
In the case of Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 2:51 pm
A good one.) [read post]
28 May 2012, 3:27 pm
Citing the Florida Supreme Court's decision in Gooding v. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 2:34 pm
That is basically the fact pattern from District of Columbia v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 7:09 am
The post TDR Wars—Episode V: OIG Strikes Back appeared first on Government Contracts Legal Forum. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:11 am
See Aramark Corp. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 2:34 pm
That is basically the fact pattern from District of Columbia v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 4:00 pm
I’d say there is a good chance that the Court will accept this case. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:36 pm
Principle #4: There is no overriding principle of good faith in English contract law but there are a series of piecemeal solutions to unfairnessGood faith is probably about honesty and commercial dealing though it may extend to requiring the parties to have fidelity to their bargain.As a matter of contract law there is no pre-contractual duty of good faith; but a duty to negotiate in a dispute resolution clause may bind the parties see eg Emirates Trading v Prime… [read post]
