Search for: "Hope v. Hope"
Results 8041 - 8060
of 23,988
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
[Paul Cassell] Do crime victims have an interest in avoiding unreasonable delay in criminal appeals?
3 Feb 2017, 1:11 am
See State v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 10:52 am
Harlan was 26 years old at the time and young Harlan the slaveholder was quite a different man than Harlan the author of the Plessy v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 10:48 am
In Shaughnessy v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 10:32 am
Hammond v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:29 am
In Vigil v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 8:34 am
In Gubala v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 9:00 pm
The Tenure in Office Act was repealed in 1887, and in the case of Myers v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:30 pm
Although criminal convictions occur in open court and may be reported on contemporaneously, as Lord Hope explained in R (L) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2009] UKSC 3 at [27]: “as [the conviction] recedes into the past, it becomes a part of the person’s private life. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 8:09 am
I hope so, but don’t know enough about him to say. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 3:25 am
In any case, 2017 promises to be a momentous year for the victims of corporate human rights abuses looking at the English courts as their last hope for justice. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 5:29 pm
This last bit is particularly interesting — last year, in Gutierrez-Brizuela v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 12:33 pm
The Tax Court issued its final decision in Whistleblower 21276-13W v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
Juliana v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 3:52 am
The Supreme Court heard the appeal in Cadder v HMA 2011 SC (UKSC) 13 later in May 2010 and would ultimately decide in October 2010 that the Scottish practice of denying accused persons access to a solicitor while detained was unlawful. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 8:41 am
Promises to repeal Roe v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 4:27 am
” President Andrew Jackson famously responded to the Supreme Court’s 1832 decision in Worcester v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:34 am
Last week’s unanimous decision by the Manhattan-based Appellate Division, First Department in Shapiro v Ettenson, 2017 NY Slip Op 00442 [1st Dept Jan. 24, 2017], affirmed the lower court’s order enforcing an operating agreement signed by two of the LLC’s three co-founding, co-equal members, adopted two years after the LLC’s formation without the signature or consent of the LLC’s third member. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 9:51 am
[Citing Dodson v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 3:00 am
R. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 8:07 pm
I hope cases of individuals with visas traveling as this executive action went into effect — including some who served alongside U.S. troops — will be resolved quickly. [read post]
