Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 8041 - 8060
of 18,115
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2010, 11:34 pm
Justice Sotomayor is a strong presence at oral argument, like Justices Scalia and Breyer.One final statistic of note, especially to those of us who practice primarily in the Ninth Circuit: we're no longer the black sheep of the federal courts. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 4:42 am
In Pavan v. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 11:56 am
OLSON: Well, and that's --JUSTICE KENNEDY: You're aware of the fact that if we write an opinion with the -- with the rule that you propose, that we should, as a matter of common sense, ask about the consequences of that rule. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 8:13 am
The decision came in the case of State v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 12:33 am
And that means that their client is the system of criminal justice and it means, more precisely, that their client is Justice (note the uppercase J) whatever the hell Justice is.Back in 1935, writing in Berger v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 8:23 am
If you’re going to be crazy, you have to get paid for it or else you’re going to be locked up. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 4:33 pm
See Archer And White Sales, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:57 am
Ahmad v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 6:38 pm
Updating yesterday's ILB report on the Supreme Court's decison in Ronnie Drane v. [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 9:19 pm
In Kokesh v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 10:02 pm
Not surprisingly, each side said that the other's position amounted re-writing the document rather than construing it. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 1:00 pm
In today’s case (Kalsi v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:55 am
For the latter, see Hartman v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 11:56 pm
The Supreme Court's observations in JK Industries v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 11:07 am
That was a question that was left open in the Virginia Military Institute case [United States v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 1:24 pm
” The court cited Greenlaw v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 9:30 am
POORMAN... v. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 7:20 am
And she discussed Buckman v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:25 pm
" KSR's brief never cited In re Kotzab, 217 F.3d 1365, or Ruiz v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
These questions, among other things, find a response in High Court for England and Wales, Chancery Division's ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in Enterprise Holdings Inc v Europcar Group UK and Another [2015] EWHC 17 (Ch), which Katfriend Aaron Wood (Swindell & Pearson Ltd) kindly reports. [read post]
