Search for: "In re An. C."
Results 8041 - 8060
of 28,787
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2011, 9:26 am
In re Hoover’s Residence, 2011 U.S. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 12:01 pm
In conjunction with the introduction of H.R. 1063 on Monday, we should feel as if perhaps we're finally headed in the right direction. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:47 am
Moreover, upon the testimony at the re-opened hearing, Detective Brown’s July 29, 2009 narrative entry does not negate the truth underlying the Court’s fundamental conclusion that all the affidavits and warrants were executed on July 24, 2009. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 6:50 am
In re J.N.Y., 2007 PA Super 227, 2007 Pa. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 3:22 am
In re Lakisha M., 2008 Ill. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 7:03 am
However, as a general rule, if you're going to tout the benefit of a product you generally only need to disclose any downsides if they are closely related to the advertised benefit. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 8:59 am
While the officer may say the defendant is free to go, the defendant doesn’t necessarily know it even if the officer tells him he can go but then re-engages him in conversation. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 12:55 pm
Appellate court's reliance on DWI videotape of his stop but its absence from that court's record required remand for the tape to be included and re-evaluated. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 6:28 am
“The Court finds that the statement, ‘What you’re looking for is lying on the front seat of the vehicle,’ to be effective consent to search the vehicle. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:21 am
Sells, 463 F.3d 1148, 1154-55 (10th Cir. 2006); see also id. at n.1 (all federal circuits follow the doctrine of severability, though courts refer to it by different terms -- severability, severance, redaction, or partial suppression) (citing In re Search Warrant Dated July 4, 1977, 667 F.2d 117, 133 (D.C. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 12:58 pm
The case is In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, No. 11-12268 & 11-15421 (11th Cir. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 3:56 am
(In re Lance W. (1985) 37 Cal.3d 873, 888–889 [210 Cal. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 9:37 am
If you're among those out having a good time, designate a driver who will not be drinking. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 9:01 pm
LEXIS 182 (December 17, 2010): To the extent that the defendant may have a reasonable expectation of privacy in his medical records generally, see In Re Search Warrant (Med. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 4:29 am
Negotiations with Robbins to reestablish the easement broke down and he refused to re-grant it. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 7:35 am
Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 501 (1983) (noting "statements given during a period of illegal detention are inadmissible even though voluntarily given if they are the product of the illegal detention"); In re Maricopa County Juv. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 7:53 pm
In re Det. of Peterson, 145 Wn.2d 789, 799, 42 P.3d 952 (2002). [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 1:50 pm
Alas, we're not used to doing this and mobile phones don't encourage us to do so, making the procedure clumsy. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 4:42 am
In re Jackson, 2007 Ohio 4955, 2007 Ohio App. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:27 am
Cochran, 939 F.2d 337 (6th Cir. 1991) (agents executing search warrant may require occupant who has departed the premises to be searched to re-enter residence and remain there while the search is conducted); United States v. [read post]
