Search for: "John Does, 1-2"
Results 8041 - 8060
of 10,076
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2010, 1:18 pm
But as it happens, there's a wealth of evidence, most of which the state knew and concealed at the time of trial, indicating that (1) Keith didn't do it, and (2) Rodney Melton did.Here's a sample. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 7:00 am
"Insureds" for purposes of UIM coverage was expressly limited to three categories of persons: (1) persons designated on the declarations as subject to the UIM policy, (2) family members of persons designated in the UIM policy, and (3) persons occupying vehicles driven by someone falling within category no. 1 or no. 2. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 5:23 am
The burden of proof; 2. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:17 pm
" The Lost iPhone, Part 2. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
…well I sort of half love him – ‘Firms with strong intellectual property strategies fare better in raising capital’(Tangible IP) A quick explanation on prior art (Article One Partners) Global - Trade Marks / Brands International Trademark Association (INTA) meeting: Boston: Day 1, 2, 3 (IPKat) (IPKat) (IPKat) (IPKat) (IAM) (IP Factor) (Article One Partners) Brands and INTA: going where no annual meeting has gone before? [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 10:30 pm
Rotunda and John E. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am
So how does that warrant a title of “billion-dollar lawyer”? [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:06 am
§ 301(b)(1).So, where is this Joint Strategic Plan? [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 3:42 am
On appeal, Dublin presents the following assignments of error: [1.] [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 3:37 am
Moreover, the materials submitted by the defendants in support of their motion did not constitute "documentary evidence" within the meaning of CPLR 3211(a)(1) (see Fontanetta v John Doe 1,AD3d, 2010 NY Slip Op 02743 [2d Dept 2010]) and, in any event, did not "utterly refute[] plaintiff[s'] factual allegations, conclusively establishing a defense as a matter of law" (Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. [read post]
31 May 2010, 10:08 am
In my humble estimation, it is knowingly making large quantities of exact copies of a trademarked, patented, or copyrighted good with the intention of selling such large quantities to defraud consumers and the rights holders.Thus, any anti-counterfeiting treaty would have the elements: 1. exact copies or copies intended to be so similar that a consumer could not tell the difference;2. protected goods;3. large quantities (500?) [read post]
30 May 2010, 2:08 pm
Trustee Region 2 v. [read post]
30 May 2010, 9:15 am
Does this mean that Transformational Mediation is a “bad idea”? [read post]
30 May 2010, 8:41 am
A mediator is not a therapist and does not act like one. [read post]
29 May 2010, 12:52 pm
1. [read post]
28 May 2010, 12:44 pm
”Sponsored by Senator Linda Newell (D-Littleton) and Representative Jerry Frangas (D-Denver), the newly-signed bill is designed to help thwart the “pattern of crime over time” – 1) damage property, 2) injure or kill a pet, then 3) attack their victim – that abusers and stalkers often follow. [read post]
28 May 2010, 7:23 am
Bd. of Regents (1984-2 Trade Cases ¶66,139), agreements among sports teams about whether and how they will participate in the marketplace are subject to scrutiny under the Sherman Act, Section 1. [read post]
27 May 2010, 2:26 am
We recognize that they list the URL of applicant’s website and/or a telephone number for contacting applicant’s sales representatives/ordering personnel; however, this level of information does not create the same point-of-sale situation as a detailed catalogue capable of allowing a consumer to consummate a physical order, or a detailed web page, or even the same as a situation where there is the option of placing an order via telephone based upon detailed information from the… [read post]
26 May 2010, 9:12 am
The last time I actually posted to this blog (notice the liberal use of guest bloggers, which means I have been able to sleep more and to go to the gym more regularly, which means my mind is more sharply focused for when I do blog; see how this all works, and what I do for you?) [read post]
26 May 2010, 5:42 am
It does contain a brief summary of the John Hancock demutualization. [read post]
