Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 8041 - 8060
of 8,589
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2008, 1:11 pm
This case was cited in the Supreme Court in R. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 2:53 pm
In Meacham v. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 2:53 pm
In Meacham v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 9:14 pm
As part of a reduction in force, Knolls developed a review system to determine which managers to lay off. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 12:00 pm
A lay jury lacks the expertise and the broader perspective of FDA and thus cannot adequately adjudicate individual patient risks in the context of population benefits - quintessentially the kind of issue FDA must confront every day. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 8:47 pm
Negron-Fuentes v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 9:07 pm
Our recent post on the Supreme Court's decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 6:43 pm
Sauna by Airwall: Ever lay there in a nice hot sauna and think to yourself.... [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 5:49 pm
Costa v. [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 11:17 pm
The holy grail for many copyright scholars on this exact issue could have been Agence France-Presse v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 8:21 am
Supreme Court except Daubert v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 8:30 pm
The case of United States v Hunt, 521 F. 3d 636 (6th Cir. 2008) was a fraud prosecution of a doctor, who had signed medical necessity orders necessary to allow Noble, a diagnostic technician, to receive Medicare and private insurance payments for ultrasound tests performed on patients seen by the doctor. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 7:42 pm
In Laabs v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 7:48 pm
See id.; see also Reliable Consultants, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 10:28 am
State v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Supreme Court, June 02, 2008 US v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:27 pm
The case is Thompson v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 1:18 pm
In a short sua sponte merits decision, the New York Court of Appeals in Roberts v. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 2:17 pm
"The affirmation of plaintiff's counsel did not lay a sufficient foundation to establish that what counsel represented to be plaintiff's claim form was admissible under the business records exception to the hearsay rule (see CPLR 4518; Midborough Acupuncture, P.C. v New York Cent. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 2:11 pm
NO-FAULT - ADMISSIBILITY OF BUSINESS RECORDSFirst Aid Occupational Therapy, PLLC a/a/o Israel Alvarvenga & Travis Fox-Ross v. [read post]
