Search for: "Light v. United States"
Results 8041 - 8060
of 11,342
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2023, 9:12 am
State v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:14 pm
Johnson v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Baylor, No. 07-3002 Defendant's convictions for interfering with commerce by robbery, in violation of the Hobbs Act, and using a firearm in relation to a crime of violence are affirmed over meritless claims that: 1) the requirement of a de minimis effect on interstate commerce under the Hobbs Act is unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court's decision in US v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 1:31 pm
The state appealed to the Supreme Court, which announced in January that it would review the case, Lamone v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 9:48 am
There is no danger in this case that defendant will be punished for conduct that is legal where it occurred, because Title VII is a federal law that applies everywhere in the United States.Dukes v. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
If Bitqyck used “any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce for the purpose of using a facility of an exchange within or subject to the jurisdiction of the United States to effect one or more transactions in a security,” it could be held liable for hosting an unregistered exchange. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 6:53 am
As our Supreme Court recognized in Roth v. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 2:48 pm
In Naurto v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 6:59 am
McCarthy is right that the United States was not formally at war with Britain at that time. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 4:48 pm
Can victims in Canada (Canadian Citizens) pursue justice in the United States Federal courts to be compensated as a result of defective hernia mesh? [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am
Diamond Innovations Inc (EDTexweblog.com) (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania will revisit and reconsider the standing issue in false marking case: United States of America ex rel FLFMC, LLC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 7:38 am
The General Assembly is now weighing in on the Court of Appeals ruling in Bruce Jones v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:13 am
” At Take Care, Leah Litman considers what light Azar v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
" (3)However, some nations such as the United States of America (USA) and the United Kingdom (UK) have at points sought to make methods of execution less liable to bungling or to inflicting gratuitous suffering. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 8:52 am
Looking to Strasbourg jurisprudence, he commented, “[t]he ECtHR will only find that the state has acted in violation of A1P1” if its judgment is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” (James v United Kingdom (1986) 8 EHRR 123). [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 5:25 pm
Hoehn, No. 11-16751 (9th Cir.) - United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:50 pm
United States, the blame for my current headache does not lie in the drafting. [read post]
27 Nov 2024, 10:49 am
Bobulinski worked with Hunter Biden in 2017, when Bobulinski served as the CEO of SinoHawk Holding, "a [Chinese] company designed to find investments in the United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:35 am
-Alabama v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:20 pm
On February 7, the Supreme Court of Hawai'i decided State v. [read post]
