Search for: "Mark Harms" Results 8041 - 8060 of 10,422
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2011, 4:31 pm
Are any of these particular websites truly causing economic harm to GNLV? [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 12:29 pm by Sheppard Mullin
YSL also sought cancellation of Louboutin’s red sole trademarks based on the marks' lack of distinctiveness, the functional nature of the marks at issue; and its use of ornamental, aesthetic and design elements that do not serve as source identifiers for Louboutin -- all factors that YSL alleged suggest that the red-sole mark was not eligible for trademark protection. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 7:11 am by Josh Camson
Why risk not having the disclaimer there if its absence could harm you or your firm down the line? [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 6:56 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Energy Guy” references and Bhelliom didn’t provide any harm evidence. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 8:41 pm by Karl-Friedrich Lenz
According to the article, the high-level area residents showed a marked reduction in cancer mortality. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:33 pm
 (3) Is it only the risk that the consumer or end-user might be misled into assuming that the trade mark proprietor is responsible for the repackaging which is of significance in answering Question 1, or are other considerations regarding the trade mark proprietor also relevant, for example (a) that the entity which in fact undertakes the purchasing and repackaging and reaffixes the trade mark proprietor’s trade mark on the… [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
Turning next to the foreseeability of harm, that factor weighs in favor of finding a duty.... [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 11:47 am
Take the 30 year old mother in Georgia, who was crossing the street with her three children, although not in a marked cross walk. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 8:51 am by Dennis Crouch
Note: The preliminary injunction issue (esp. irreparable harm) is to be discussed in a separate post. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:29 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The court found the survey demonstrated that exposure to the old logo caused an association with Gap’s marks. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 2:04 pm by Geoffrey Manne
  But here FairSearch misses the mark in telling ways. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 6:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” This is not a case in which the parties’ marks are so similar that the consumer would initially become interested in EcoSense because it mistakenly thought EcoSense’s product was made by Suntree; the parties’ marks could not be confused. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 11:13 pm by Marie Louise
Pink Sprinkles (Trademark Blog of the Trademark Lawyer’s Mind ) Starbucks – Starbucks sues for declaration of no trademark infringement over SDN mark: Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:37 pm by Simon Gibbs
Perhaps the Bill should be renamed the Access to Justice Bill Mark II. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 5:18 am by SHG
  Was her walking across the street with her kids, despite the absence of a marked cross-walk, really so blameworthy that this had to follow? [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 8:28 am by David M. Trontz
Apparently, the defendant had marks on his neck, thereby corroborating the defense's theory of the case. [read post]