Search for: "PAGE v. UNITED STATES" Results 8041 - 8060 of 9,968
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
Media reports indicate that this Ordinance was drafted during the previous regime under the United Progressive Alliance. [read post]
§ 793, prohibits “willfully retain[ing]” information “relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation” and “fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it” (emphasis added). [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 8:47 am by INFORRM
  The action arose from a program originally broadcast on August 15, 2004 (episode), Ali G interviewed Gore Vidal (Vidal) regarding the United States Constitution and Amendments thereto. [read post]
9 May 2016, 2:16 pm by Giles Peaker
– their ‘Policies’ page states Under 36 years old – no offers of accommodation will be made to anyone under 36 years old where the local housing authority shared room rate equals less than the rent and service charge regardless of employment status. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 5:11 am by SHG
That’s the case in United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:47 am by SHG
California, supra; United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 4:56 am
Having fundamentally misunderstood the nature of invention, the United States Supreme Court has dealt a potentially disastrous blow to personalized medicine in its decision in Mayo v Prometheus, which invalidated Prometheus’s claim to a diagnostic correlation. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 2:29 pm by Mary
The United States has a long tradition of protection for reader privacy. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 4:23 am by jonathanturley
While the district court ruled against Wilson, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed and found a violation of the First Amendment. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 6:16 pm by Gideon
Just the say-so of a 44 year old woman, almost an entire lifetime after it allegedly occurred.1 Imagine, as Justice Douglas did, dissenting in United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 11:36 am
You can separately subscribe to the Pharma & Biotech edition of the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review by subscribing by email, or selecting ‘all posts’ or ‘Pharma, Biotech & Chem’ for the RSS option at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Plavix (Clopidogrel) – Canada: Supreme Court upholds selection patents: Apotex v Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada et al (Pharmacapsules @… [read post]
23 May 2008, 10:33 am
Khadr and passed the fruits of the interviews on to U.S. officials has been found by the United States Supreme Court to violate U.S. domestic law and international human rights obligations to which Canada is party. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 11:31 am by Amy Corbett Dion, Esq.
  The Supreme Court of the United States may ultimately weigh in on this apparent split amongst the Circuits, if and when these cases are appealed. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 11:13 am
 A work may be registered with the United States Copyright Office, but the creator is protected by copyright law even if the work is not registered. [read post]
16 May 2021, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
United States In the case of Hedine v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 9:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Damich, Senior Judge, United States Court of Federal ClaimsDownload TestimonyDamich was chief IP counsel for Senate Judiciary at the time; not providing views of judiciary but recollections as staffer. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The 124-page document lays out in detail how Powell repeatedly made provably false claims about Dominion. [read post]