Search for: "PAGE v. UNITED STATES"
Results 8041 - 8060
of 9,968
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2010, 10:46 am
The United States Supreme Court discussed the definition of “prevailing party” at length in Buckhannon. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 6:29 am
From Kuck v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
For example, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting’s 2010 budget is just $400 million.[2] While many look to CPB to fund children’s programming (among its many other activities), its entire budget is no more than a quarter of the total amount of U.S. advertising revenue produced by children’s programming from food and beverages products alone: $1.6 billion in 2006 by the FTC’s most conservative estimates.[3] That comparison illustrates the vital importance of… [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:44 am
Check the United Student Aid Funds SCOTUSwiki page for additional information. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 8:12 am
Whether the district court properly determined that State Lease 79-0645 was a “replacement lease” under the Unit NPI Contract. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 11:11 pm
Here’s the case: United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 7:21 pm
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 12:15 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 11:25 am
We may learn more about these pitfalls from the other trademark owner-v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 5:29 am
Recall the history of United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 5:05 pm
In Sonzinsky v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 6:55 am
And the Boston Globe reported on the responses of states whose laws forbid corporate campaign donations prior to Citizens United. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
– EIPR article (PatLit) United States US Patent Reform Dr. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 3:50 am
State Bank of India, Bagpat, Distt. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 3:10 pm
Again, one need not accept such claims: The evidence linking Serrano v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 2:11 pm
The Courts provided for in subsection A of this section [i.e., all the Oklahoma state courts –EV], when exercising their judicial authority, shall uphold and adhere to the law as provided in the United States Constitution, the Oklahoma Constitution, the United States Code, federal regulations promulgated pursuant thereto, established common law, and the Oklahoma Statutes and rules promulgated pursuant thereto in making judicial decisions. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 10:49 am
United States, 470 U.S. 598 (1985); Fedorov v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 10:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 7:17 am
Adler notes that the Court’s 1990 decision in United States v. [read post]
