Search for: "Peter v. Peter"
Results 8041 - 8060
of 8,635
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2021, 12:47 am
In the first judicial determination in the world of its type, the Australian Federal Court has held that artificial intelligence systems or devices can be “inventors” for the purpose of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) (Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879). [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:27 am
It’s hard not to feel sorry for the petitioner in Fernandes v Matrix Model Staffing, Inc., Decision and Order, Index No. 160294/2021 [Sup Ct, NY County Apr. 20, 2022]. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm
The three judge DeCoster appeals panel issued a three-opinion ruling, with the majority advancing a concept of responsible corporate officer liability arising from the FDCA and the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:24 am
Ironically, Carter did not cite the one case I know about in which a court suggested in dicta that Section 1104-a (d) is inapplicable in the absence of a Section 1118 buy-out — the 2010 decision in Pappas v Fotinos which I wrote about here. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 6:21 am
Nr 6 of the list, The EPO’s Vision (V) – Trust, was a sad display of what this principle meant to Battistelli: ‘… if trust is supposed to be the EPO’s vision, why does the EPO President apparently believe the EPO needs an “investigative unit” (aka as “Stasi” in examiners’ speech)? [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 4:57 am
http://tinyurl.com/2a93gv4 (Robert Unterberger) International eDiscovery, Sanctions, Ethics and US-UK Comparisons at Georgetown - http://tinyurl.com/25yj3gt (Chris Dale) Keyword Searches not Good Enough for eDiscovery, Experts Say - http://tinyurl.com/232mkh9 (Cindy Waxer) Lateral Moves, Court Rulings Spotlight E-Discovery - http://tinyurl.com/2ffcjwc (Gina Passarella) Legislators, Regulators Consider 'Do Not Track' Mechanism - http://tinyurl.com/2d28p3m (Lora Bentley) Moody v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 8:45 am
Sweeney, who presided over the month-long trial that ended on July 17.The Court of Appeal's 2005 decision in State Farm v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 3:20 pm
Peter M. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 9:32 am
Here's the call:APPEL A CONTRIBUTIONSL’ÉTAT SOUVERAIN A L’ÈRE DE LA MONDIALISATION –STRUCTURES ET PROCESSUS DU CONSTITUTIONNALISME GLOBALDans le cadre des échanges biennaux entre la Société française pour le droit international et la Deutsche Gesellschaft für Völkerrecht, l’Université Bâle organise desRENCONTRES DE JEUNES CHERCHEURSEN DROIT INTERNATIONALCes rencontres, qui auront pour thème… [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:47 am
Maryland – Hershey v. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 2:20 am
Toy Makers, The Globe and Mail, Aug. 31, 2007.[2] Peter Lattman, Made in China, Sued in the USA, Wall St. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:54 am
Supreme Court stripped tribal governments of their criminal authority over non-Indians in Oliphant v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 12:22 am
Before moving on to the last item, I wanted to point out this Anita Lee story in the Sun Herald on the Jones v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:50 pm
Check out Scott Greenfield's post on Berghuis v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 8:27 pm
The Su Âpreme Court's decision in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 4:37 am
I am especially delighted to blog about Estate of Connie Collins v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 12:45 am
It is superfluous for cases such as Ericsson v Apple, costly and lengthy for the litigants, and clogs the court system. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
Thus, in the words of Professor Peter Tufano of Harvard Business School, a view of the victims suggests that they may remain silent for many reasons, including risk, guilt, and shame.How do the con artists function? [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 11:59 am
I remember sending her P V Baker QC's great work Snell on Equity’ * many years ago - with a bookmark at the page on secret trusts. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 7:41 am
One recent example is the case of Ash v. [read post]
