Search for: "Richard Doeing" Results 8041 - 8060 of 14,142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2017, 6:01 pm by Nate Cardozo
Sessions has offered no specifics, but does “believe this is a more serious issue than Tim Cook understands. [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 6:01 am by Adam Greaves
The SFO’s last director, Richard Alderman, has followed the same path during his four year tenure at the SFO - all of the corporate defendants who were charged with corruption in recent years agreed to a civil settlement instead of defending the charges at trial. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 3:17 pm by Stephen Griffin
  For one thing, anything he does potentially constitutes a new “precedent,” a new moment for constitutional law. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:00 am by Unknown
The same goes if original meaning is indeterminate, or even conceptually incoherent, on most contested questions, as Richard Fallon has recently argued. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 1:13 pm by Sandy Levinson
, though he does cite (and discuss) Thomas Mann’s and Norman Ornstein’s It’s even worse than it looks:  How the American constitutional system collided with the new politics of extremism. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:47 am by WIMS
<> Demand response part of Army prep for climate change - In this interview with Kathleen Wolf Davis of Intelligent Utility, Richard Kidd, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Energy and Sustainability for the U.S. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 12:40 pm
  Guided by a unifying vision of the value of an arbitral remedial mechanism, they eventually constituted themselves the  Drafting Team of the Hague Rules on Business and Human Rights Arbitration and included among them Bruno Simma, Chair, Diane Desierto, Martin Doe Rodriguez, Jan Eijsbouts, Ursula Kriebaum, Pablo Lumerman, Abiola Makinwa, Richard Meeran, Sergio Puig, Steven Ratner, Giorgia Sangiuolo, Martijn Scheltema, Anne van Aaken, and Katerina Yiannibas. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 9:05 am by K&amp;L Gates
 In doing so, the court reasoned that prejudice was presumed because the evidence was destroyed intentionally and explained that no showing of malice was required.Briefly stated, this case arises out of Plaintiff’s claim that Defendant Richard Hart and his wife breached the contract for the sale of their company—American Diagnostics, Inc. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 2:32 pm by Timothy Edgar
Richard Nixon’s National Security Advisor, Henry Kissinger, requested wiretaps on White House staff to uncover news leaks involving classified information. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 2:01 pm by Isaac Park
It was stored in the brig, and Rhodes-Wolfe is sure that the cell was locked, although she does not remember how. [read post]
7 May 2017, 8:42 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
This section of the Bar speaks to the need for the criminal statute at issue to be narrowly interpreted so that it does not reach doctors who only wish to fulfill the final, rational requests of their terminally ill, dying patients. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 7:47 am by Florian Mueller
District Judge Rodney Gilstrap (December 9, 2022)The press release does not state the exact length, but it is a "multi-year" agreement. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 9:40 am
District Judge Richard Kopf, who writes a wonderfully blunt and honest blog, Hercules and the Umpire (of which I am big fan, even though I often disagree with Judge Kopf), recently asked  the rhetorical question, "Why does Kopf believe cops most of the time? [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 6:00 am by Julia Solomon-Strauss, Stephen Szrom
When the judge insisted, Aaron divulged that the person being considered does not possess a security clearance. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
He told us to stop doing the one thing that is almost all anyone does nowadays. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
  As the Supreme Court observed, albeit not in the product liability context, “[m]eaningful disclosure does not mean more disclosure. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  And it really does not matter whether the reader is “pro-state” or more a devotee of what was accurately called, by many opponents of the Constitution, a “consolidated” national government with basically plenary powers to pass any and all legislation deemed in the national interest. [read post]