Search for: "State v West"
Results 8041 - 8060
of 9,653
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2009, 6:34 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: New Zealand Prime Minister announces s 92A ‘three strikes’ copyright provision will be scrapped (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (ContentAgenda) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Public Knowledge) (Excess Copyright) (IPKat) US: TomTom files countersuit against Microsoft claiming its Streets… [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 8:17 am
Since the first lawsuit under the Act, wireless carriers have had a tough time turning zoning application denials into approvals in federal court in the states that comprise the 4th Circuit–Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, North Carolina and South Carolina. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:26 am
The September 23, 2011, decision of the federal district court in West Palm Beach, Florida, in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
I’ve written about Kirtsaeng before, see also More on Kirtsaeng v John Wiley, What Kirtsaeng Won’t Answer, The United States “Odd” Kirtsaeng Argument, and Overturn Quality King? [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 4:07 pm
Also check Diana West on our blogroll who has been a leading voice in exposing the lack of transparency and reporting on these jihad attacks. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 1:53 pm
Also check Diana West on our blogroll who has been a leading voice in exposing the lack of transparency and reporting on these jihad attacks. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:57 pm
Also check Diana West on our blogroll who has been a leading voice in exposing the lack of transparency and reporting on these jihad attacks. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
In addition to regulating behavior during armed conflict, Protocols II and V, specifically, require parties to a conflict to take specific measures post-conflict to reduce the dangers posed by mines, booby traps, and other forms of unexploded and abandoned ordnance. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 7:29 am
Titanic, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 5:00 am
Also, unlike the health care shields, the second wave of shield legislation tended to be limited to southern and some mountain states, with reduced adoption in the northeast and the west. [read post]
16 Jun 2007, 4:49 pm
It's Case 1641/02 OAO Plodovaya Kompaniya v Russia, judgment being given on 7 June.In 1966 the USSR Ministry of Foreign Trade created the State Export and Import Agency Soyuzplodoimport. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 6:59 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond ruled in January in the case U.S. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:58 pm
Since the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Murphy v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 9:00 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am
On the same day Collins J gave judgment in the case of Dew v Mills Nanyn . [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court interpreted the federal RFRA in Burwell v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 1:00 pm
Their super abilities were the same, as was their stated intent to battle against “evil and injustice,” (Detective Comics. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 5:48 am
192/18, Commission v Poland; C? [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 10:30 pm
A: We call one another up by hull number or position if hull is unknown (eg, "Warship five-nine this is Warship three-seven, over" vs "Warship in position two-one degrees two minutes north, one-five-seven degrees five-six minutes west, this is Warship three-seven four nautical miles off your port bow, over. [read post]
