Search for: "State v. Browning"
Results 8041 - 8060
of 8,739
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2022, 1:23 pm
Circuit Judge Janice Rogers Brown. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm
Referring to counter-terrorism cases and relevant public protocols in the UK, his presentation demonstrated the complexity of state secrets, the supervision of security intelligence agencies, and the tension between human rights and national security. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 5:58 am
Carême v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 11:40 am
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 12:30 pm
The complaint cites Justice Story's dicta in Lowell v Lewis (1817) which stated that inventions that are "injurious to the well being, good policy, or sound morals of society" are unpatentable. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am
There was therefore no error in the case. (1) Defendant’s challenge to the second step of the Batson analysis was preserved; (2) The State’s proffered explanations for its use of peremptory challenges were racially neutral; (3) The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant failed to show purposeful discrimination under the totality of circumstances State v. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 12:00 pm
While accepting that there has been a shift from color-blind v. race-conscious to protect v. repair, Fleming and McClain query how “fundamental” this change is. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 8:47 am
De Havilland v. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 7:50 am
But the New Deal/Civil Rights Era that produced Brown v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 9:03 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 2:29 pm
It may be assumed that today’s Supreme Court (which has deemed consumer welfare to be the lodestone of antitrust enforcement since Reiter v. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 10:45 am
Those Progressives saw the administrative state as the sword of social justice, particularly in the New Deal era. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm
For example, in Nichols v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:44 pm
Vermont National Telephone Company v. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 1:06 pm
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson drew questioning back to the fundamental role of the court’s authority on equal protection, invoking Loving v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 8:47 am
First, the government confirms in detail, at pages 3-6 of its reply brief, what I surmised last week: Both of the conditions would undermine the government's furtherance of its compelling interests, principally because there would be state-law obstacles to the creation of contraception-only insurance policies, and because the "opt in" requirement would impose burdens on women that their male counterparts do not share and that would, as a practical matter, decrease the… [read post]
20 May 2013, 4:23 am
The nongovernmental organisations which are signatories to the Joint Memorandum of Understanding on Fire and Building Safety (dated March 15, 2012), having stated their intention to support the implementation of this programme, shall, at their own election, be signed witnesses to this Agreement. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:26 am
By Michael Kiely & Phillip Tate In his budget submitted on January 10, 2011, one week after taking office, Governor Jerry Brown proposes to slash $12 billion in State spending in a wide array of areas, including, welfare, health services and higher education. [read post]
