Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 8041 - 8060 of 15,316
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2023, 12:00 pm by Gary Corn, Melanie Teplinsky
Entitled “Combating Ransomware: One Year On,” the paper was drafted in consultation with leading experts in the field: V. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 5:24 am by Jocelyn Bosse
In addressing the issue of unreasonable delay, the Munich Local Division observed that Syngenta’s request for a preliminary injunction was justified under Rule 206.2(c) of the UPC Rules of Procedure. [read post]
3 May 2023, 6:34 am by David Pocklington
 On 28 April the Home Office updated its Fact Sheet on the Bill, which indicated those measures within the Act to commence on 3 May 2023, v infra. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 6:39 pm by Eric S. Solotoff
  In fact, the Child Support Guidelines includes, but is not limited to 23 possibilities for income, as follows: a. compensation for services, including wages, fees, tips, and commissions; b. the operation of a business minus ordinary and necessary operating expenses (see IRS Schedule C); c. gains derived from dealings in property; d. interest and dividends (see IRS Schedule B); e. rents (minus ordinary and necessary expenses - see IRS Schedule E); f.… [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Fashion: first mover + TM protection for brand name is arguably sufficient b/c of ephemerality of designs. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:57 am by John Elwood
United States present the question of how that provision should be read: whether a defendant is ineligible for relief from the mandatory minimum if her criminal history runs afoul of any one of the disqualifying criteria in subsections (A), (B), or (C), or is ineligible only if her criminal history runs afoul of all three disqualifying criteria, subsections (A), (B), and (C). [read post]
22 Oct 2006, 8:18 am
Last weekend's visit to the Sagamore for the annual meeting of the New York State Bar Association's IP Law Section was well worth it. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 3:35 pm
Southern Pacific Mortgage Ltd v Heath [2009] EWCA Civ 1135 It has taken me a day or three to get to this one. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
The more interesting part of the decision concerns the plaintiffs’ direct, contract claim alleging that the issuance of the treasury shares without payment violated the operating agreement’s provision stating that the Class C treasury units “will only be issued as Class C Units, unless purchased/assigned to Class A Member(s). [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 8:15 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A private detective has only the right of a private person with respect to arrest, Dohery v. [read post]